The delegates at UUA GA 2024 will conduct the final vote on replacing the Seven Principles and Sixth Sources (which are in Article II). At last year's GA (General Assembly, 2023), the delegates were encouraged to vote for the proposed changes, with the argument that a "yes" vote would enable UUs to "continue the conversation" in the coming year.
I wish that the UUA and UUMA had truly encouraged congregations to hold deliberative conversations, to discuss both sides of the issue, in preparation for selecting GA delegates. Instead, the UUA/UUMA have been mostly either promoting the changes, or have been assuming that the changes are a done deal (for example, in the preparation of new religious education (RE) materials). Personally, I feel the whole process has been manipulative, and at odds with encouraging the democratic process; the UUA/UUMA have not encouraged congregations and individual UUs to form wise and responsible opinions on the matter.
The situation is so bad that many UUs are still blissfully unaware that their beloved Seven Principles may well be voted out, in just three weeks. If it happens, it will be a surprise to too many.
One congregation that held a deliberative conversation was UUCJ (Jacksonvile), which held a workshop in which presentations were given on many aspects of the issue. The church has made their presentations available here. The result of their their vote was summarized in a letter to other congregations; PDF version here.
Other resources are: the Save the Seven Principles website and Facebook group; UU the Conversation; and the UUA's promotional/RE material.
The GA vote will be held in about three weeks--this is worth becoming a delegate to vote on, or discussing with your congregational delegates to GA.
EDIT: changed "One of the few congregations to hold a meaningful conversation ..." to "One congregation that held a deliberative conversation..." In my view, if the "conversation" is merely a one-sided presentation of promotional material, and doesn't involve deliberation and debate, so that people can discern the issues at hand (and then vote or otherwise reach consensus), then it isn't very meaningful.
[link] [comments]