WWUUD stream

๐Ÿ”’
โŒ About FreshRSS
There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Is FUUSE Dead?

11 November 2008 at 07:05

I took a peek into the UU Young Adult world today, and saw a lot of empty space, particularly on the once popular and UU Blog Award Winning FUUSE.com.  No posts since June 2008.

...and the home of the brave....

7 November 2008 at 17:18
Yes. "Free at last, free at last, Great God Almighty, we are free at last." And I'm not really certain whether we should Praise God, that Supreme, Divine Being Who gives us life and gives life meaning...or simply thank our lucky stars...but this has sure been a very special week all over the world. And despite the incredible amount of chaos that still seems to reign over much of reality, I feel as if we all at last have at least turned a corner.



Now comes the TRULY hard work -- the challenge of coming together, agreeing on our priorities, defining our objectives, goals and desired outcomes, allocating our resources to match those priorities, and doing the work that needs to be done. Just doing the work. Believe me, there is plenty of work to go around for everyone. I hardly know where to begin.

Where to be on Election Night

2 November 2008 at 18:41

1992 was the first year I remember gathering to watch election returns.  I was already in college at the University of Oregon, and was mesmorized that a Democrat could actually win the White House.  Clinton came to campus once, and even played his sax.  I remember gathering with a whole bunch of friends for beers.

1996 I was in Colorado doing political work, and so the place to be was at the Democratic Party at a downtown hotel.  I remember bumping into a few UO grads who were out there campaigning as well!

2000 and 2004 were nights to watch from the road or in graduate school.  2000 was the most disturbing with the whole Republican machine in action. By 2004, our kids were in the picture.  This year, 2008, 3 kids, I’ll be on fivethirtyeight.com and watching the news!

Baby Brain and Preaching

20 October 2008 at 14:45

I gave my first of 3 sermons yesterday at my home church of West Hills.  I remarked afterwards that I probably should be taking a break, our littlest baby-3 is now 6 months, still doesn’t sleep through the night, and whew, my brain is pretty mushy.  

I will be preaching at Don Heights in Toronto next week, then in Hood River Oregon.  And I’m writing original sermons for each.  I actually can’t quite bring myself to use the same text twice.  It always gets changed pretty substantially when I sit down to prepare.  

I am not yet an extemporaneous preacher, although I tried that when I was younger.  I remember watching Rev. Stephen Kendrick and loving his ability to do that.  Perhaps we’ll see his son do the same thing (don’t know if he is in seminary, but he was an ambitious youngster in YRUU with leadership).

It is amazing what months and months of sleep deprivation will do.  I actually used to take naps, but now that I am going back to work after a good amount of time off, well, naps just are not in the cards.  I did once lay down on my office floor for 30 minutes of shut eye, no pillow though, and it was hard.

Too Scary for Words

16 October 2008 at 15:51


Yes, this is an actual, legitimate, unphotoshopped photograph from last night's debate, showing EXACTLY what it appears to show: the decrepit old (white) Man Who Would Be President sticking his tongue out and (pretending to be?) grabbing at the ass of the handsome and articulate young (black) Man Who SHOULD Be President. And I hope this image surges through the media the same way that the Dukakis tank commander photo or Howard Dean's "Scream" did...but I doubt it will. It's the sort of photo that is easily ignored: no sound, no movement -- just a moment of still photography easily explained away as "a misdirected old man who got confused and was heading off stage in the wrong direction." Which sort of fits the overall theme of the McCain Campaign these days anyway.

I actually thought McCain did pretty well last night: didn't foam at the mouth, kept his temper, put Obama on the defensive with his carefully-crafted (and unrebuttable) innuendo, and basically seized control of both the tempo and the direction of the debate by ignoring the moderator and butting in whenever he felt like it. Played the race/age/experience card for all it was worth: a seasoned, well-tested (white) "Maverick" vs. the "eloquent," smooth-talking and good-looking but relatively unknown (and unfamiliar BLACK) "tax and spend" liberal. But at the end of the day, it was still the same old tired words out of the mouth of a washed-up, over-the-hill politician desperate for his crack at four years of unprecedented executive power.

I was, although, particularly entertained when McCain used a variation of the same line I suggested Al Gore should have used when Bush attempted to link him to the various Clinton scandals back in 2000: "that was the fella who beat your daddy; you have to run against ME." God how I wish Gore had won that election -- or should I say, fought harder to prevent the Bushies from STEALING that election. What a different world we would be living in now....

And it is still my fantasy that as George W. Bush exits the Inaugural Platform next January, it will be into the waiting arms of representatives of the World Court, who will then escort him to his holding cell in the Hague. And of course my great fear is that there will be no Inauguration -- that after the fiasco of THIS election (and God only knows what may happen next) the Bushies will fabricate some desperate excuse for holding on to power, and enforce it by military means.

Do we really want to see tanks in the streets of Washington DC? They say it could never happen here. But you know, recently I've seen a LOT of things folks said could never happen here. And while some have been good, some others have been not so good as well.

I guess a couple of other quick thoughts before I sign off, since I post here so infrequently as it is. I'm really concerned that we need not just an Obama victory, but an Obama landslide for this election to really create the mandate that Obama needs to effect meaningful change: a huge margin in both the electoral and the popular vote, plus solid majorities in both Houses, and strong showings in local elections as well. We need to sweep aside every last remnant of Karl Rove's vision of a "permanent Republican majority," and reinstate the more tolerant and diverse "liberal" family values based on civility, mutual concern, and the larger public good.

But beyond that, we will be laying a tremendous burden of expectation upon the shoulders of a single individual -- more than any one individual can possibly bear, I think. And so we all need to be willing to step up and to sacrifice in order to create the change we need. Sacrifice = to make sacred. It's OK if we all share it. But the plutocratic "croney capitalism" of the past eight years has GOT to end. And steps need to be taken to return that unprecedented concentration of wealth back to ALL the American people, so that it might be used for the common good.

And at the same time, given the Bush administration's unapologetic attempts to concentrate power in the hands of the Executive Branch, and the apparent NEED for that kind of power the next administration will claim it needs in order to undo the mess the Bushies have created, is there ANY politician on the Planet who could possibly be convinced to LET GO of that power once the essential tasks have been accomplished. We need a Cincinnatus, and not a Caesar. George Washington understood that. I think even Michael Dukakis did. But do you really think that Sarah Palin has even a CLUE to what I'm talking about?

The Politics of Spectacle and Distraction

27 September 2008 at 13:22
Last month I blogged on this site comparing Sarah Paliln's selection as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate to the Harriet Meiers nomination to the Supreme Court, and suggested that within the week the Alaskan Hockey Mom would gracefully withdraw from the ticket, having done her job of confusing an ever-more fickle electorate and distracting attention from the real issues in these critical last few weeks before voters finally go to the polls. LINK to Original Post here (be sure to scroll down through the comments).

Now here comes the Other Shoe. Palin is clearly failin' Big Time -- she's not only out of her league, she's WAY out of her league -- even her own party can see it, it makes me a little sad even to have to witness it; and IF she remains on the ticket, and IF the Republicans should somehow manage to win in November, it is almost a CERTAINTY that Sarah Palin will at some point become the POTUS -- which would make our country more FUBAR than I even dare to imagine.

So maybe it's my turn now to do a little praying. God help us. God help us. God help us. God help us....

How Racism Works.

17 September 2008 at 19:47
A former parishioner of mine just e-mailed these to me, and I found them so telling I've decided to spread them around as much as I can. Hope all y'all will do the same!

How racism works:

1. What if John McCain were a former president of the Harvard Law Review?
2. What if Barack Obama finished fifth from the bottom of his graduating class?
3. What if McCain were still married to the first woman he said "I do" to?
4. What if Obama were the candidate who left his first wife after she no longer measured up to his standards?

1. What if Michelle Obama were a wife who not only became addicted to pain killers, but acquired them illegally through her charitable organization?
2. What if Cindy McCain graduated from Harvard?
3. What if Obama were a member of the "Keating 5"?
4. What if McCain were a charismatic, eloquent speaker?

If these questions reflected reality, do you really believe the election numbers would be as close as they are? This is what racism does. It covers up, rationalizes and minimizes positive qualities in one candidate and emphasizes negative qualities in another when there is a color difference.

Mary M. Gaylord
Sosland Family Professor of Romance Languages and
Literatures
Director of Undergraduate Studies
Undergraduate Adviser for Romance Studies
424 Boylston Hall, Harvard Yard
Cambridge MA 02138
Ph: 617-496-6027; Fax: 617-496-4682
--
Jane R. Dickie
Professor of Psychology and Women's Studies.
Hope College.
Holland, MI 49423

Onward and Upward Forever

12 September 2008 at 21:47
There's been quite a lively discussion lately both here in the blogosphere and also on the various UUA CHAT-lists to which I subscribe about the new Commission on Appraisal's proposed revisions to our current statement of Principles, Purposes and Sources. I don't have much to add (or at least not much that I CARE to add) to the discussion there, but I do think it might be fun to glance back at the "original source material" for what, historically at least, has been both our most popular and most parodied statement of "Things Most Commonly Believed Among Us To-Day."

[For those of you unfamiliar with Five Point Calvinism, it might help to remember the acronym TULIP: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistable Grace, and Predestination. In other words, there is not a healthy bone in our bodies, but God for reasons known only to Himself has chosen to redeem a few of us from eternal damnation. But it is ONLY a few, and even if we would rather NOT be saved we're going to heaven anyway. Furthermore, it was all decided for us since before the beginning of time, so stop fretting so much about Faith and Works and the moral consequences of your actions, or whether or not you have Free Will, and get out there and earn a little more money for the greater glory of God, fer crissakes!...]


***
"The Five Points of Calvinism and the Five Points of the New Theology" from Vexed Questions in Theology by James Freeman Clarke (Boston: 1886)


“And thou shalt make . . . five pillars, and overlay them with gold, . . . and shalt cast five sockets of brass for them." — Exodus xxiv., 37.

THE number five has acquired as great significance in theology as it has in nature. The largest family of plants is that of which the flowers have five petals; and the most popular theology of modern times is that of Calvin with its five points of doctrine, which relate to Absolute Decrees, Atonement by Christ for the Elect only, Original Sin, Effectual Calling, and the Perseverance of Saints.

Such have been the main and essential doctrines of Orthodoxy in the past. These doctrines have revolved around the ideas of sin and salvation. The creeds are as remarkable for what they omit as for what they assert. They scarcely allude to those truths which Jesus makes the chief burden of his teaching, — love to God, love to man, forgiveness of enemies, purity of heart and life, faith, hope, peace, resignation, temperance, and goodness. It is certain that the theology of the future will dwell on something else than the five points of Calvinism, and I have thought it well to consider the counterparts of this ancient system in five points of the coming theology. Let us endeavor to see what they will be.

I. I believe the first point of doctrine in the theology of the future will be the Fatherhood of God.

The essence of this is the love of the father for his children. Fatherly love is a wise love, a firm love, and a pure love, which seeks the best good of the child. Thus this idea of fatherhood includes that of the holiness, the truthfulness, and the justice of God, — in a word, all the divine attributes. The justice of God as a father is not, as in the old theology, an abstract justice, which has no regard to consequences. God's justice is only another form of mercy. It is the wise law which brings good to the universe, and is a blessing to every creature.

Jesus has everywhere emphasized this truth, that God is a father. We find it pervading the Gospels and coloring all his teaching. We find it already in the Sermon on the Mount, which tells us that we are to let our light shine, not to glorify ourselves, but to glorify our Father in heaven; that we are to love our enemies, that we may be like our heavenly Father, who loves his enemies, and makes his sun rise on the evil and the good. Jesus tells us that, when we pray, we are to pray to our Father, not to infinite power or abstract justice or far-off sovereignty. We are to forgive others, because our Father in heaven forgives us. We are not to be anxious, remembering that our heavenly Father feeds the little birds of the air. We are to pray, confident that our heavenly Father will give good things to those who ask him. Thus, this idea of God pervades the earliest as it filled the latest teachings of Jesus.

This idea of the divine fatherhood goes down so deep into the human heart that it becomes the source of a childlike obedience, trust, submission, patience, hope, and love. It brings consolation to us in our trials, gives us earnestness in prayer, makes it less difficult to repent when we have done wrong. We look up out of our sin and weakness and sorrow, not to an implacable law, not to an abstract king, but to an infinite and inexhaustible tenderness. Thus, this doctrine is the source of the purest piety.

2. The second point of doctrine in the new theology will be, I think, the Brotherhood of Man.

If men are children of the same father, then they are all brethren. If God loves them all, they must all have in them something lovable. If he has brought them here by his providence, they are here for some important end. Therefore, we must call no man common or unclean, look down upon none, despise none, but respect in all that essential goodness which God has put into the soul, and which he means to be at last unfolded into perfection.

As from the idea of the fatherhood of God will come all the pieties, so from that of the brotherhood of man will proceed all the charities. This doctrine is already the source of missions, philanthropies, reforms, and all efforts to seek and save those who are surrounded by evil. It leads men to feed the hungry and clothe the naked, to teach the blind, to soothe the madness of delirium, to diffuse knowledge, and carry glad tidings to the poor. And this doctrine, when fully believed, will be the source of purer moralities and nobler charities.

This truth, also, Jesus has taught by his words and his life. He went about doing good, feeding the hungry, making the blind to see, the deaf to hear, the lame to walk, cleansing the leper, preaching the gospel to the poor. He was the friend of publicans and sinners, of the Roman centurion, the woman of Phoenicia, the woman of Samaria. He was the friend and helper of all who needed him. In the story of the Good Samaritan, he taught that all men are brethren. And his last recorded words were the command to preach the gospel to every creature.

3. The third point of doctrine in the new theology will be, as I think, the Leadership of Jesus.

The simplest definition of a Christian is one who follows Christ. This was his own definition: "My sheep hear my voice, and follow me." "I am the way and the truth and the life." "Come to me, all ye who labor and are heavy laden." When Mary sat at the feet of Jesus, and heard his words, he said that she had chosen the good part, and had done the one thing needful.

A Platonist is one who studies the teachings of Plato, and takes him for his teacher and guide in philosophy. A Swedenborgian is one who studies the teachings of Swedenborg, and takes him for his guide in theology. A Christian is one who takes Jesus as his guide in religion, and who goes directly to his teachings for religious truth.

But hitherto, instead of considering those as Christians who have studied the words of Jesus, and sought to know the truth, the name has usually been given to those who accepted some opinion about him. Not what he himself teaches, but what the Church says he teaches, has been made the test of Christian fellowship. Men have been told to go to Jesus, but on the understanding that they shall learn from him only the same thing which the Church has already learned. Instead of sending us to the teacher himself, we are sent to our fellow-students. We, therefore, in reality take them, and not Jesus, for our leader.

The Athanasian Creed asserts as unquestioned verities certain metaphysical statements in regard to the nature of the Deity and the relations which existed between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit before the creation. These speculations are read four times a year in the Church of England, and the people are told that those who do not believe these superhuman mysteries shall without doubt perish everlastingly. Is it not evident that the Church, in doing this, takes the unknown author of the creed as its leader and teacher instead of taking Christ himself? All human creeds which are made the tests of what Christ taught are in reality put in his place. Compared with his teaching, they are all narrow and unspiritual. They emphasize some purely intellectual statements which chanced to be popular when they were written. The makers of these creeds tell us to call Jesus teacher, but to learn from themselves what he teaches. They show thus that they dare not trust us to go to him; and they show that they have no real faith in him as the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

Of course there is no harm in a creed, when it merely states what a man believes at the present time or what any number of men believe at any particular period. The harm comes from making the creed a perpetual standard of belief, a test of Christian character, and a condition of Christian fellowship. Such creeds, instead of uniting the Church, have divided it into endless sects and parties. Let men take Jesus himself as their leader and teacher, and the Church will be again one. Then Christians will come into communion not only with the mind, but also with the heart of the Master. When the whole Church is like Mary sitting at the foot of Jesus and hearing his words, it will be more full of his spirit. Bigotry and sectarianism, which have cursed Christianity, will disappear, and be replaced by the large generosity and ample charity of Jesus himself. We shall then, according to his striking Oriental image, eat his flesh and drink his blood. Instead of merely accepting propositions about him, we shall assimilate his character and feed on it in the depths of our heart. Then will lie fulfilled his saying: "My sheep hear my voice, and follow me. I know my sheep, and am known of mine."

4. The fourth point of the new theology will be Salvation by Character.

Salvation means the highest peace and joy of which the soul is capable. It means heaven here and heaven hereafter. This salvation has been explained as something outside of us, — some outward gift, some outward condition, place, or circumstance. We speak of going to heaven, as if we could be made happy solely by being put in a happy place. But the true heaven, the only heaven which Jesus knew, is a state of the soul. It is inward goodness. It is Christ found within. It is the love of God in the heart, going out into the life and character. The first words which Jesus spoke indicated this belief. The poor in spirit already possess the kingdom of heaven. The pure in heart already see God. "This is life eternal, to know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent." He who has the faith which Jesus possessed has eternal life abiding in him. The water that Jesus gives becomes a spring of water within the soul, "springing up into everlasting life." Do not look for a distant heaven, saying, " Lo! here," or " Lo! there;" " for the kingdom of heaven is now with you." When we come to study the words of Jesus as we study human theologies, we shall find that he identifies goodness with heaven, and makes character the essence of salvation. As long as men believe that heaven is something outward, to be attained by an act of profession or belief, they, will be apt to postpone such preparation as long as possible. But when we apprehend the inflexible law of consequences, and know that as a man soweth so shall he reap; when we see that spiritual tastes and habits are not to be formed in an hour; and that all formal professions, prayers, and sacraments avail nothing, unless the heart is pure, the soul upright, and the life one of integrity, — then a new motive will be added to increase the goodness of the world. Then the formation of character will be the fruit of Christian faith to an extent never before realized.

5. The fifth point of doctrine in the new theology will, as I believe, be the Continuity of Human Development in all worlds, or the Progress of Mankind onward and upward forever.

Progress is the outward heaven, corresponding to the inward heaven of character. The hope of progress is one of the chief motives to action. Men are contented, no matter how poor their lot, so long as they can hope for something better. And men are discontented, no matter how fortunate their condition, when they have nothing more to look forward to. The greatest sufferer who hopes may have nothing, but he possesses all things: the most prosperous man who is deprived of hope may have all things, but he possesses nothing.

The old theology laid no stress on progress here or progress hereafter. The essential thing was conversion: that moment passed, the object of life was attained. A man converted on his death-bed, after a life of sin, was as well prepared for heaven as he who had led a Christian life during long years. And there was no hint given of farther progress after heaven should be reached. Eternity was to be passed in perpetual thanksgiving or in perpetual enjoyment of the joys of paradise. Such, however, was not the teaching of Jesus. The servant, in the parable, who earned two pounds, was made ruler over two cities : he who earned five pounds had the care of five cities. And the Apostle Paul tells us that one of the things which abide is hope. If hope abides, there is always something to look forward to, — some higher attainment, some larger usefulness, some nearer communion with God. And this accords with all we see and know: with the long processes of geologic development by which the earth became fitted to be the home of man ; with the slow ascent of organized beings from humbler to fuller life; with the progress of society from age to age; with the gradual diffusion of knowledge, advancement of civilization, growth of free institutions, and ever higher conceptions of God and of religious truth. The one fact which is written on nature and human life is the fact of progress, and this must be accepted as the purpose of the Creator.

Some such views as these may constitute the theology of the future. This, at least, we see, — that many of the most important elements in the teaching of Jesus have had no place, or a very inferior place, in the teachings of the Church in past times. As the good Robinson foretold, "more light is to break out from the Word of God." The divine word, revealed in creation, embodied in Christ, immanent in the human soul, is a fuller fountain than has been believed. No creed can exhaust its meaning, no metaphysics can measure its possibility. The teaching of Jesus is not something to be outgrown; for it is not a definite system, but an ever unfolding principle. It is a germ of growth, and therefore has no finality in any of its past forms. "Of its fulness," says John, "we have all received, and grace added to grace." The Apostle Paul regarded his own knowledge of Christianity as imperfect and partial. "We know in part," said he, "and we teach in part." Christianity in the past has always had a childlike faith, which was beautiful and true. But its knowledge has also been that of a child. It has spoken as a child, it has understood as a child, it has thought as a child. This was all well while it was a child. The prattle of an infant is sweet, but in a youth or man it is an anachronism. Let us have a childlike faith, but a manly intelligence. "In malice be children, but in understanding be men." Let us endeavor to see God and nature face to face, confident that whoever is honestly seeking the truth, though he may err for a time, can never go wholly wrong.

/and their Cultures (1st Principle)

12 September 2008 at 04:43

I admit I have not been paying close attention to the recent UU Commission on Appraisal report establishing the first comprehensive point of discussion around revising our Principles and Purposes.  Note:  I just found myself unsure of whether to title these as our “religious”, “associational”, or “faith” principles and purposes.  Hmm…probably associational, but that sounds weird.

Anyway, I generally keep up with UUA politics now through Scott Wells’ blog.  He highlighted some commentary about cultural appropriation.  My thought, which with the power of instant blogging is this.

When I was active in UUA racial justice work…when there was collective and accountable racial justice work with respect to strategy, development and evaluation…we sometimes analyzed how the first principle is often used to bludgeon people with individualism, but is also a powerful social justice reminder.  Someone said, “I always read the first principle, and add …and their Cultures.”  Respecting the Inherent Worth and Dignity of Every Person, and their Cultures.  Its that latter piece that seems to coalesce our social justice activism, when we have a deeper, more mature sense of the worth and dignity for their culture.  At least around racial justice.  Not sure if this plays true for gender, sexual orientation, or physical ability equal access initiatives of the UUA that have been oh so successful.

9/11 +7

11 September 2008 at 13:28
Lest We Forget....

"A Mind-Numbing Act of Senseless Violence"

a sermon preached by the Rev. Dr. Tim W. Jensen
at the Second Congregational Meeting House
on Nantucket Island, Sunday September 16, 2001


If you found this engaging, I continued in this same theme for the remainder of the month of September.

September 23, 2001
September 30, 2001

"An alert and knowledgeable citizenry..."

10 September 2008 at 23:56
This was Ike's (the President, not the hurricane) prescription against the triumph of the Military Industrial Complex, and the domination of our cherished free and democratic institutions by the forces of corporate greed, fear-mongering, and unregulated triumphalist capitalism. And I just wish I'd had the good sense to save the clip of his farewell address from YouTube (where I saw it), so that I could embed it here. Because it was amazing to me: both just how prescient and prophetic Eisenhower's observations have turned out to be, and also how different our society is today from what it was half a century ago.

The Civil Rights Movement. The "Summer of Love." Vietnam/Watergate. Feminism. Stonewall. Earth Day. Pat Robertson, the Moral Majority, and the Rise of the Religious Right. "Voodoo Economics" and the Reagan Revolution. AIDS. The Fall of the Berlin Wall and the End of the Cold War. The End of History and the Clash of Civilizations. Global Climate Change. Oh, and lets not forget about the information technology that has driven so much of the acceleration of our culture: computers, cell phones, the Internet. Or our global addiction to fossil fuels, and the politics of oil which have replaced Communism as the number one perceived threat to our national security.

And yet, rather than an alert and knowledgeable citizenry, we seem to have opted for bread and circuses...or at least cheap fast food and "reality" TV. We complain about the price of gasoline (when it's probably HALF of what it ought to be...), and watch with fascinated horror as the longest and most expensive Presidential Election in history enters its last 60 days, and suddenly becomes Reality TV writ large. Where's Jerry Springer when you need him? As the former Democratic mayor of Cincinati, he certainly should understand what's high in the middle and round on both ends. An election that seemed impossible for the Democrats to lose now looks more and more like a Republican shell game, all coming down to a final roll of the dice in the too-close-to-call crap shoot at the end. It's no longer about issues or policy. It's all just about holding on to power for another four years. If you can only confuse the electorate for another eight weeks.

At least Camille Paglia claims to have a handle on it all...

But what of Palin's pro-life stand? Creationism taught in schools? Book banning? Gay conversions? The Iraq war as God's plan? Zionism as a prelude to the apocalypse? We'll see how these big issues shake out. Right now, I don't believe much of what I read or hear about Palin in the media. To automatically assume that she is a religious fanatic who has embraced the most extreme ideas of her local church is exactly the kind of careless reasoning that has been unjustly applied to Barack Obama, whom the right wing is still trying to tar with the fulminating anti-American sermons of his longtime preacher, Jeremiah Wright.

The witch-trial hysteria of the past two incendiary weeks unfortunately reveals a disturbing trend in the Democratic Party, which has worsened over the past decade. Democrats are quick to attack the religiosity of Republicans, but Democratic ideology itself seems to have become a secular substitute religion. Since when did Democrats become so judgmental and intolerant? Conservatives are demonized, with the universe polarized into a Manichaean battle of us versus them, good versus evil. Democrats are clinging to pat group opinions as if they were inflexible moral absolutes. The party is in peril if it cannot observe and listen and adapt to changing social circumstances.
[salon.com 9/10/2008]

Meanwhile, on an almost completely unrelated note, this is what I looked like back in 1976, just before I took advantage of my opportunity to "exercise the franchise" and vote for Jimmy Carter my first-ever Presidential election. I appear exceptionally alert and knowledgeable in this photography, don't you think? The strong, square chin. The long, curly flowing hair. The six-pack abs. Talk about changing times!

People's Church of Chicago

9 September 2008 at 19:16

Patrick Murfin writes a little history about Rev. Preston Bradley.  I read it with great interest.  Years ago, I met a young UU who lived down the street from the Peoples Church UU on the North side of Chicago on West Lawrence St.  We went there several times, and later I attended a UU Urban Ministry Conference there.  It is an amazing facility, 7 stories or so, thousand person sanctuary, and Rev. Bradley’s name is engraved on the outside.  Its story was lumped in with other great urban congregations that declined with White Flight in the 1970s.  I didn’t learn more (nor did I see much at the church about its history…today there are only a handful of memberes).

It is remarkable to read of Bradley’s development, as well as recognize the marginalization he experienced (as has been reported) with peers and UUA leadership.  It makes me wonder if the respect and relationship were stronger, would the great UU ministry he established in a changing, multiracial neighborhood, have been strengthened and spreading among the many cultures that live there today?  The lesson of Theodore Parkers great ministry in Boston and the great decline when he left has taught us much about the need for collective support and care for our faith, to make it sustainable.  I pray that we make this effort with those who minister in communities, or in ways, not always in the mainstream of suburban UU congregations.

Lipstick

5 September 2008 at 15:00
I've never really found myself in the position of trying to apply lipstick to a pit bull. A pig, maybe. Or roadkill. But never a pit bull.

We're asking all the wrong questions about Sarah Barracuda. To repeat an insight I quoted from another blogger in an earlier post to this thread, "I'll be honest: if Sarah Palin was a fiercely pro-choice progressive, mother of five kids, who'd risen from mayor of a small town to democratic governor of her sparsely populated state, I'd be kind of in love with her. Wouldn't you? And wouldn't you, although a little hesitant, be excited about her having been selected as Obama's vice-president?"

The question isn't really whether she will be ready on Day One to take over as President. Few people are; in fact, I question whether ANYONE really is. The real question is whether or not she is ready now to be a candidate for the vice-presidency, whatever THAT means. And that really is something for the voters to decide for themselves.

Personally, I find myself somewhat fascinated by the folksy, small town Alaskan frontier provincialism in which being a commercial fisherman and a snow machine champion somehow count for as much as an Ivy League education...and maybe matter more. I love the schtick about being able to field dress a moose, and selling the gubernatorial jet on e-Bay. And she certainly does a credible job of reading someone else's words off a teleprompter; you can see how she earned her Barracuda nickname.

What I DON'T like are all the things that make her so popular with the other side to begin with: the pro-life, abstinence-only views regarding sex education; the attempted library book-banning; her attitude about the environment and global warming; and all the rest. I wouldn't vote for a candidate who held those positions under ordinary circumstances. Why should a little lipstick make any difference now?

And then there's this. I think little Trig will someday forgive his mom her 60-some day absence in his infancy to run for vice-president. And if she actually wins... what a way to grow up!

But how much lipstick will it take to make THIS look good?

Cussometer Rating

2 September 2008 at 22:33
The Blog-O-Cuss Meter - Do you cuss a lot in your blog or website?
Created by OnePlusYou - Free Dating Site

Thanks James for pointing us all to this. Reminds me of the old joke about how the only time the Lord's name was heard in the Unitarian church was when the sexton hit his thumb with a hammer....

Yet Another Thought about Sarah Palin

2 September 2008 at 13:01
***
M LeBlanc raises some interesting points about Sarah Palin over at her blog, Bitch PhD.

I'll be honest: if Sarah Palin was a fiercely pro-choice progressive, mother of five kids, who'd risen from mayor of a small town to democratic governor of her sparsely populated state, I'd be kind of in love with her. Wouldn't you? And wouldn't you, although a little hesitant, be excited about her having been selected as Obama's vice-president?

Yeah. OK. Maybe... I think THIS goes a little over the top though...

Race, Gender, and Social Location

30 August 2008 at 23:09
And as I sit here slack-jawed over McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as his Vice-Presidential Running Mate, it occurs to me just how successfully he has distracted MY attention from the Democratic National Convention, and its message of "John McCain: More of the Same." Can't help but wonder whether this is just a tactic to take the spring out of the Democratic bounce, and that sometime next week there will be a graceful, Harriet Miers style withdrawal and Mitt will be back on the ticket after all.

Of course the Democrats are "on the right side of history." But if all we can talk about is the beauty-queen's hairstyle, how does that really help us now that "we are facing a planetary emergency which, if not solved, would exceed anything we've experienced in the history of humankind." [Al Gore]

Sure, "people the world over have always been more impressed by the power of our example than by the example of our power." [Bill Clinton] But what kind of example of democracy do we set when issues and ideas are inevitably crowded out of the headlines by gossip, public spectacle, and personal attack?

And Joe Biden's grandmother may well have taught him that "No one is better than you; everyone is your equal, and everyone is equal to you." The problem is, a lot of people in this country -- powerful and important people -- don't really believe in all that "equality" crap.

And it's not just about race or gender either.

It's about the difference between someone who is about to lose their home to foreclosure on a sub-prime mortgage, and someone who can't even remember how many houses they own.

Or who has never had to worry about the affordability of their health insurance, because they have ALWAYS been able to afford to see any doctor that they wanted any time that they wanted, and to pay the bill in cash.

Or who doesn't really care about the rising cost of attending college, because their family has gone to the same private college in Connecticut for generations, and will no doubt continue to do so regardless of cost, or grades, or their SAT scores....

Sigh. How did the senior Senator from Massachusetts put it?

"The Work Begins Anew.
The Hope Rises Again.
And the Dream Lives On"

A loose canon?

27 August 2008 at 23:16
Over at his blog "The Latest Form of Infidelity," the Reverend Colin Bossen poses the question of whether or not there are certain Unitarian and Universalist "sacred texts" that rise to the level of Scripture, or at least "simply the special status of being important texts."

When I was still in seminary, and even early on into my ministry, this question of whether or not there was (or should be) a UU "canon," and which texts (or by what criteria texts) should be included in it was fairly important to me. But I later came to feel and understand that in many ways the whole issue of canonicity is misdirected -- it's a backhanded attempt to define an orthodoxy by defining a center so explicitly that the boundaries are no longer elastic or permeable.

Rather than canonizing our own, new "Scripture," what we are really looking for is a UU "Talmud" -- a body of texts that we can engage in on-going study and dialog with in ways that also engenders dialog with one another. So to the modest list of texts and authors you have mentioned, I would also want to add Henry Ware Jr's Formation of the Christian Character, as well as his introductory discourse following his own faculty appointment at Harvard on the relationship between Pulpit Eloquence and the Pastoral Care. His sermon on "The Personality of the Deity" (delivered in response to Emerson's Divinity School address) would also be on my short to medium list.

His father Henry Ware Sr's 1774 Compendious and Plain Catechism... written in collaboration with Ware's neighbor and colleague in Hingham, Daniel Shute (who thanks to where his name falls in the alphabet gets top billing, although we all have a pretty good idea of who really did most of the hard work) is also a document well-worthy of our attention...since it is doubtlessly one of the principal reasons Ware was nominated and selected for the Hollis Chair to begin with.

The "Wood 'n Ware" texts, on the other hand, are probably way too involved for general inclusion, but they might well be "mined" and anthologized for appropriate content, especially since they are considered by many scholars to be the best discussion of the issues of predestination and free will since Luther and Erasmus debated the question back in the 16th century.

[if it seems as though I am paying a lot of attention to the Wares, it is NOT simply because I wrote my own doctoral dissertation about them. Rather, it has to do with the historical observation that as key members of the Harvard Divinity School faculty, between the two of them they essentially educated an entire generation of Unitarian clergy in what is often referred to as the "Golden Age of American Unitarianism" -- a cohort which included both Emerson and Parker, as well as James Freeman Clarke, William Henry Channing, Joseph Henry Allen, and scores of others who continued to serve "Our Liberal Movement in Theology" well into the remainder of the century.]

Conrad Wright used to place great stock in Henry Whitney Bellows' "The Suspense of Faith;" if memory serves, I even recall hearing him say that if he had it to do over again, he would have included Bellows as the "Fourth Prophet" in the now-nearly canonical anthology that enshrined Channing, Emerson and Parker as the Holy Trinity of the 19th century Unitarian tradition in the first place.

One of the original criteria for New Testament canonicity was the suitability of the text for reading at public worship. Based on that source of authority, I've been struck by how often the words of Mary Oliver, Annie Dillard, and T.S. Eliot (or at least that bit on "the end of all our exploring") are proclaimed from our pulpits and lecterns on Sunday mornings. Forrest Church's passages on "The Cathedral of the World" and "the dual reality of being alive and having to die" both make my short list as well. Inclusion in the Hymnal is a clear and obvious marker of some form of semi-scriptural canonicity, so I suppose that Barbara Pescan and Mark Belletini (along with many of our other colleagues, both living and dead) would qualify on those grounds alone.

Here's another question: when we designate a text as "Scripture," what kind of authority does that give it? I often raise this point when talking about inerrancy and the authority of the Bible. Is something "true" simply because it has been included in the Bible? Or are things included in the Bible because somebody, somewhere thought that they were True? Profound Truth is in some ways the ultimate test of Scriptural Authority...and if it IS True, it's going to still be true (and thus authoritative) regardless of the kind of authority we assign it by designating it as "scriptural." So in that sense, anything we designate as scriptural is really just a tool to help us better discover and understand the scripture "written upon the heart." And that list could grow to be very long indeed.

Better UUA Elections Disclosure

11 August 2008 at 22:49

This is a snap brainstorm after reading Philocrites comment.

With UUA election spending topping $100,000 (shocking), I think the UUA needs better disclosure rules (Bylaws 9.12.8) for campaign contributions than the first day of the GA where the Elections will be held.

It can’t be that tough, just upload an excel sheet with the contributions.  I’m sure records are being kept as contributions come in.  Even better, post them online for fuller disclosure, although that might raise privacy concerns.  Maybe posted to a place where you can get a password if you’re a member of a UU congregation?

Why not require them to be submitted quarterly, plus the month before the election.  So say Sept 1, Dec 1, Mar 1 and June 1?  Seems this would not be very time intensive, but would be informative to the UUA electoral college.

I don’t know if we need UUA Campaign Finance Reform, but its worth considering.  $100,000 is a lot to have to fundraise to be UUA President.

On another note – does anyone know if the reporting from the last UUA Presidential Elections is available?  I imagine I could write the Secretary…

What? $100,000 UUA Presidential Campaign?

10 August 2008 at 14:42

I’m a bit shocked to read this on Peter Morales UUA for President Blog.

The last two successful candidates spent over $100,000.

I don’t know about our UUA election process, how closely it mirrors the best practices of US elections from our democracy standpoint.  Are all donors revealed?  Whats the timeline?  I know we look closely at Obama and McCain, and then analyze.  I wonder if that will be done more for UUA now that we have the internet?

My Heart Still Aches

9 August 2008 at 14:29

And I’m not sure how I feel about this Knoxville UU Ad Campaign. I wish this story would come out without having to advertise.

UU=Post Christian? I Agree

4 August 2008 at 12:50

I’ve used the term regularly to describe us Unitarian Universalists…not in a negative way, but in a comprehensive way. It does not encompass all of us obviously, but gives credit to our history.

UPDATE 8/5/08

I appreciate the deeper discussion that is sprouting here. I also like that folks are raising the anti-oppression analysis. I’m going to think about that more and post a response here later. I read this editorial about how Christian the Unitarian response was in Knoxville, who then proceeded to add fuel to our fire:

“…despite the fact that the Unitarian church is hardly Christian at all…”  (Scolded by Unitarian)

Do Any UU Churches Live Webcast?

3 August 2008 at 14:06

I know a number of UU Churches have podcasts of their services, after the fact.  The UUA has webcasted parts of GA.  Anyone know of a UU Church that webcasts their Sunday Service?

Gone Fishing

1 August 2008 at 13:29

Friday Family Photos.  Aneroid Lake, outside Joseph, Oregon.

Alternative Olympic Opening Night (Portland)

29 July 2008 at 17:44

Thought I would send along an announcement about an event Aug. 8th – the opening night of the Olympics – to celebrate Tibetan culture.

Please join The Crag Law Center and The Tara Cafe Project on August 8 as we celebrate Tibetan culture with the Portland premiere of /The Unwinking Gaze/. The 2008 documentary by Joshua Dugdale provides behind the scenes insight to the Dalai Lama’s struggle to lead his people to a peaceful resolution with China. Following the film, The Tara Cafe Project will give an inspiring performance of traditional Tibetan music. The Tara Cafe Project works to preserve traditional Tibetan culture and promote cultural continuity of Tibetan music.

  • Date: Friday, August 8.
  • Location: Clinton Street Theater, 2522 SE Clinton Street in Portland.
  • Tickets: $20. Space is limited and advance purchase is recommended. Call 503-525-2724 or e-mail megan@crag.org <mailto:megan@crag.org> for more information.
  • Time: Doors at 6:00, Film at 7:00.

Proceeds benefit The Tara Cafe Project (visit www.taracafeproject.ca<http://www.taracafeproject.ca/> for more information) and The Crag Law Center (Crag provides legal services to local communities working to protect alpine ecosystems, including Mt. Hood. Visit www.crag.org <http://www.crag.org/> for more information).

Thanks to our sponsors:
– Kline Law Offices, P.C.
– Field and Jerger, LLP
– Kristin Winter at Realty Trust Group

Democratic Video - So UU

26 July 2008 at 20:02

I got an invite to be a “face in the crowd” for an upcoming DNC ad that is being filmed in Portland. I’m a Democratic Precinct Person in District 43. You can check out the script and storyboard in this brief 2 minute YouTube video. The text is quite UU, collectivist, but some nice, probably wise and fairly accurate placements of guns, security, and free market symbolism.

You too can be in the closing crowd scene: 2223 NE Oregon Ave on Sunday July 27 at 3:00 pm. Don’t wear white or horizontal line shirts.

Everett Martin Rest in Peace

26 July 2008 at 07:05

One of the folks I enjoyed working with at the NE Coalition of Neighborhoods this last year, Everett Martin, passed away July 12.  He was a community activist and Rider Advocate on the Tri-Met system.  Everett took me on a tour of his work on day, and I admired his rapport with young and old on the streets.  He was the union steward at NECN, and a man with integrity.  He died suddenly of cancer.  He will be missed.  His young son, Everett Jr, was a joy to play with when he came over for dinner last year.  Rest in Peace.

Happiness is Preliminary Fellowship

25 July 2008 at 13:21

Family Photo Friday. After the GA 2007 Service of the Living Tradition in Portland, OR. Hometown fans (aka Mom)!

Investigator Baby (Photo)

25 July 2008 at 13:06

Family Photo Friday. Our 2 year-old, carefully inspecting all parts of the playground equipment. With her cute hat!

Pictures by Kuya (big brother)

When Things Are Hard

24 July 2008 at 13:14

I love what Willie Stark supposedly said:

“I keep the faith…in the people. Time reveals all things. I trust in the truth.”

Or something like that.

Being with Young UU's

23 July 2008 at 16:22

A Great Legacy of Rev. Sewall

21 July 2008 at 13:00

In Portland, OR, Rev. Marilyn Sewall has led First Unitarian Church into the upper echelon of UU congregations.  They are, or have been, the largest UU congregation.  They have nurtured a social justice ministry, led heavily by now Rev. Kate Lore, that has spread the UU gospel across the Tri County region.

One of her particular emphases has been upon economic justice.  In sermons, in action.  The participation of First Church in the Seattle WTO protests in 1999 garnered popular attention, and some criticism.

This week, First Church played host to a wonderful event, a speaking engagement of Chuck Collins (a UU and founder of United for a Fair Economy – the folks who brought us the Racial Wealth Divide curriculum) and Barbara Ehrenrich (Nickeled and Dimed).  Their new project is the Working Group on Extreme Inequity.  Chuck Sheketoff, uber-analyst on economic and social affairs in Oregon, wrote a nice piece for Blue Oregon.

Thanks Rev. Sewall and First Unitarian.

Tough Guys (Photo)

18 July 2008 at 13:16

Family Photo Friday!

My UU Bumper Sticker

17 July 2008 at 15:42

One Love = Unitarian Universalism

In one of those great Confucian late night efforts of distilling faith years ago, sitting around listening to the hopeful cynicism of Cat Stevens, or the warm embrace of the Indigo Girls, it comes to us young religious UU’s.  One Love.  But then U2 makes a song of it, and we’re not sure if we’ve been co-opted!

One is of course for the Oneness of God, the Unity of the classical Unitarian.

Love is God’s supreme and transformational love, that no part of creation can ultimately obstruct.  And thus, we are all Universally Saved.  Universalism.

These words seem ancient now…from another time in my life.  But they bring a smile, for what they mean, and where they are from.

Getting People Involved/What To Do First

16 July 2008 at 13:00

I’ve spent nearly my whole life organizing people together.  Tonight was a special night, bringing together a dozen Portland-area Asian/Pacific Islander activists to introduce them to APANO (Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon).  Many of us knew one another from various community projects, and some wonderful new connections were made.  I used an outline that I’ve used in many different contexts – UU, Campus, Environmental Justice, People of Color, Neighborhood:

  1. Welcome and Brief 1 minute Purpose of Gathering
  2. Personal Introductions
  3. Brief 2 minute Vision of Who We Are and Who We Hope To Be
  4. Why Did You Come/Why Are You Here – round robin, brainstorm, discussion
  5. What Would You Like to See
This can generally be accomplished in groups of 5-12 in 60 minutes or less.  Its simple, takes some preparation though.  Its most successful when you have a good, tested and articulate vision.  It also helps to know who you are, and who your audience is.
I sometimes find myself falling into this pattern of questions even in 1-1 discussions.  

UU Philippines President in Portland, OR July 26

15 July 2008 at 13:00

It is hard for many Canadian and American UU’s to imagine, but there are dozens of UU congregations outside North America whose members are economically impoverished.  My ministerial internship was in one of those places, the UU Church of the Philippines (UUCP).  There are 27 congregations on the island of Negros in central Philippines, where the vast majority of members are farmers and fisherfolk.  Their average monthly wage – $100, which puts them in the lower class even in the Philippine context (where $300/month is considered middle class).  Health care, secondary and post-secondary education, quality housing, clean water, transportation, are all virtually inaccessible and unaffordable.

And yet, there is a flourishing UU presence.  For a generation, since the late 1980’s, it has been supported heavily by UUA grants.  $15,000 or so each year, making up 75% of their budget.  It has been a lifeline, one that is changing.  While there is some despair, there is also a generation of relationships with UUA allies, and the UUA funding has supported a number of income generating projects.  Within 3-5 years, they project to make up 50% or more of their lost revenue.

The theological vision of the UUCP is more christian, more patriarchal, and in a more fundamentally Catholic context.  They are experiencing the influence of humanism later than we are, but minister from concepts of liberation theology and liberal religion.  Rev. Nihal Attanayake is the new President of the UUCP, and has been visiting UU Congregations in America over the last month.  He spoke at GA in Ft Lauderdale, and was a part of the UUMA Ministry Days.  He is the first UUCP Minister to come since Rev. Rebecca Sienes was in the USA at Meadville-Lombard.  A former Anglican Priest raised in Sri Lanka, Nihal has been a UU minister for 8 years.  He will be coming to Portland on the final leg of his trip, meeting with UU’s the weekend of July 26.

I’m excited to help host Nihal, a member of my internship committee, friend and mentor.  We’ll be meeting area ministers, lay leaders, and some members of the UU Partner Church Council.

Nihal will be sharing stories and pictures from the Philippines.  He will also be making a pitch for the Quimada Dormitory, a proposed University Dorm built on the UU Headquarters site in Dumaguete, Negros Oriental.  It is a visionary undertaking, and a great group of UU’s in America are working to fundraise.  Check out their website (uudorm.wordpress.com), and consider making a donation.  A similar dorm was built on the ancient Unitarian site in Kolosvar/Kluj, Romania (old Hungary) with substantial UUA support and direct giving.

The UUCP is welcoming ministers and lay persons on annual pilgrimage tours through the UU Partner Church Council, and on an ad hoc basis.  I’m happy to share with any interested parties about my experience and help think through traveling to the Philippines.  There is not a trip scheduled yet, but hopefully in Spring 2009.

Fuel for the Spiritual Search: last.fm

14 July 2008 at 13:30

I love Rev. Thom’s remembrance of 52 Songs in 52 Weeks.  We share some musical tastes, which are so truly generational.  Thom’s a few years younger than me (we met incidentally when he was a Reedie and I was organizing campus ministry there a decade ago!), and so there are some differences.  I was already out of the alternative scene by the time Sleater-Kinney came through, but happy to see the Pixies represented.

I’ve preached about music as the framework for living peacefully in the world.  There are so many wonderful metaphors.  It is truly the medium for so much exchange, learning, and for many of us young UU’s, for spiritual growth.  I had many a sit around in friend’s basements listening to Cat Stevens, Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley.  Sometimes it felt counter-culture (Led Zeppelin), but most often it was affirmed in Sunday Services (Simon and Garfunkel).  We would study, memorize, repeat, even discuss the lyrics.

Some of my early young adult worships centered around listening and sharing in music.  We go through a lot of effort to decide what we like, why we like it, and what it means to us.  Now though, I’m older, just turned 35, and well, I don’t hear *new* music all that much.  I’d like to, and when I shared this lament with a friend in the Philippines, she pointed me to a great new website: last.fm

At last.fm, you can put in the bands you like, and see what similar bands come up!  I’ve been surfing the site, and found some new groups based on my past loves:

Dispatch via Dave Matthews
Hieroglyphics via Disposable Heros of Hiphopricy
Lucy Kaplansky via Dar Williams

Check it out, they even have short clips!

Bug (photo)

11 July 2008 at 13:12

Friday Family Picture

UU Growth Undergoes Dramatic Shift

10 July 2008 at 06:00

I grew up in probably the most anti-growth congregation. Whenever more members would come, crowding our small sanctuary, bursting our busy RE program, taking every last coffee mug off the trays in Forest Hall, folks would shrug, and say that we don’t care about growth. Efforts at being intentional about growth encountered serious resistance. Accusations of evangelizing, breaking with our tradition, and just being downright “evil”, would ensue, and nothing would happen.

I experienced these sentiments at the district level, and continentally. I experienced it within YRUU, C*UUYAN, and among the congregational leaders I interacted with as a congregational board member for 3 years. It took me years to develop a pro-growth analysis, and part of it was directly related to my anti-racism training. But I have to applaud the administration of Bill Sinkford for really taking the lid of the growth debate. It sure doesn’t seem like a debate anymore!

I’ve loved the high profiling of growing congregations, the use of stories, and the efforts at supporting innovative ministries and ministers in their organizing and growth efforts. I don’t think it is perfect, and I’ll save my criticisms for a UUA survey for the time being, but there has clearly been a dramatic cultural shift in the mindset of many UU’s. It makes me think of Malcolm Gladwell’s “Tipping Point”, a great read (check it out in Google Reader). A serious amount of cash has been infused into these efforts, and I think we’ve only seen the tip of the iceberg. Seeds have been planted that will have influence in years to come.

I talk with UU’s who don’t cringe at the idea of planning for growth, at collaborating with area congregations, at taking to heart the pastoral and ministerial needs of newcomers as well as old-timers. There are so many issues that growing will bring up, not just diversity issues, but theological issues. One of my favorite ministers from my youth days, Rev. Barbara ten Wells, wrote a great UU World article that we should keep at heart as we grow, A Stranger In My Own Hometown (2006).

Her response to why so few young UU’s stay UU as adults:

The main reason, I believe, is this: The primary metaphor that UU adults use to describe our faith is one of exodus. We hear story after story of people who left the church they were brought up in. Too often lifelong Unitarian Universalists are left out of the story of our religion. We are made to feel that if we lack an experience of exile, we are not truly UU.

As we grow, may we keep this in mind. It is something that influenced me greatly in my last year of young adult and campus ministry work.

What a New UU Church Might Have

9 July 2008 at 23:09

I’ve been meditating, and at time dreaming about what would be at the core of a new start UU congregation here in Portland.  Several folks have asked if I’m interested, and honestly it is a huge undertaking with many, many levels of endorsements and protocol.  Still, it is great to dream, and feel what comes forth.

Three things have emerged in my mind:

Hiking with the Prophets – a weekly area hike with sharing and perhaps some brief meditation or discussion on the words of prophets.

Peace Choir – a top notch choir, with a strong core group of 8 singers, great accompanist, and well dressed choir director.

Multicultural Family Group – a weekly daytime group with free childcare, and adult discussion time.

More on this later, maybe in a month, maybe in 10 years!

Echos of GA 2007

4 July 2008 at 23:39

I just read an article 3000 Unitarian Universalists Gather for National Convention, published in the South Florida Sun Sentinel.  It carries a similar theme as the one publised by the Oregonian last year, Unitarian Universalists Find They’re Almost Universally White.  Both came out during the midst of General Assembly, and carry a similar theme about racial diversity and race relations/justice making efforts internal to our congregations and association.

The article last year generated intense buzz.  The 2007 Oregonian article was generated by a reporter who interviewed me in 2001 in relationship to the US Census adopting the policy of allowing persons to check multiple racial identities.  To be frank, it was an article that complicated several relationships for me, perhaps more due to the negativity of the headline than anything.  I followed the protocol of informing my UUA superiors and UUMA Colleagues in the Pacific NW.   I regret that the article did not emphasize the vision and innovative ministries that I shared.  I have followed up with colleagues, and particularly the ministers at First Church Portland several times, and I’ve reached a level of understanding and peace with those I’ve had dialogue with.

I was surprised at the similar theme in the Florida Sun Sentinel article (although far less in-depth), and have not seen any response from the UUA as Bill Sinkford had published the next day (which is not available any longer at OregonLive.com unfortunately).  I don’t know what the reaction has been against Nick Allen and Alice Mandt, both youth anti-racism leaders and trainer-organizers, and I expect it would not be as serious.  I expect that as a minister, and UUA staff at the time, I’m held to another standard.  Still, my heart goes out to them after my experience.

I’m curious about your impressions.  I’m doing a 4 part worship and workshop series on Race and Class in the fall, and plan to use these articles as part of the learning.  Would love your commentary to be included, with your permission of course.

Full Text of the Florida article is below.
3,000 Unitarian Universalists gather for national assembly

By Jennifer Gollan |South Florida Sun-Sentinel
June 29, 2008

Fort Lauderdale – As a Unitarian Universalist, Nick Allen embraces racial diversity and social justice — both in society and within his religion.

“We believe in the inherent worth and dignity of every person, so clearly that calls on us to address issues of racism,” said Allen, 17, a high school senior from St. Paul, Minn. Allen helped run an anti-racism seminar for teenagers at a gathering of the predominantly white Unitarian Universalist Association General Assembly on Saturday. “One of the goals is to ask ‘why are we so white? And why aren’t we more diverse?'”

Allen was among 3,000 clergy this week who mulled these and other weighty religious, social and cultural issues at the Broward Convention Center. Some attended worship services, while others participated in workshops on topics ranging from protecting civil liberties to forming grass roots organizations. The event began Wednesday and runs through today.

The Unitarian Universalist Association grew out of a merger 47 years ago of the American Unitarian Association and the Universalist Church of America. With nearly 221,000 members in 1,042 congregations, it is a theologically diverse religious group with no single creed that is among the nation’s most liberal. It blesses same-sex unions and the ordination of gays and lesbians. The movement draws on a plethora of beliefs, including atheism and liberal Christianity.

Alice Mandt, 19, a black Unitarian Universalist, said she welcomed open discussions about race and religion. Mandt and dozens of members of the Unitarian Universalist General Assembly Youth Caucus, ages 14 to 20, brainstormed ways to thwart racial, gender and sexual discrimination at the anti-racism seminar.

“There aren’t many people of color in the church,” said Mandt, a community college student from Madison, Wis. “So it’s important to have honest conversations about race. It is directly connected to broadening the appeal of the church.”

To that end, young clergy could effectively proselytize social justice and human dignity — among the church’s core principles — by learning to organize social movements, explained Jyaphia Christos-Rodgers, 47, a Unitarian Universalist who helped lead the anti-racism discussion.

“Teaching youth to engage in social movement building helps them to advocate our values,” said Christos-Rodgers, an HIV/AIDS program evaluator from New Orleans.

And it appears the message is getting through.

“This is the first time I had ever heard of Unitarian Universalists,” said Mercedes Duchange, a 59-year-old fashion designer from Pembroke Pines who attended the conference to network with clergy for Hispanic Unity, a nonprofit group that helps Hispanics learn English and gain citizenship. “Everyone is so spiritual here. If you want to join, they will accept you the way you are.”

Jennifer Gollan can be reached
at jgollan@sun-sentinel.com

or 954-385-7920.

GA ID Checks Footnote

3 July 2008 at 14:35

In many circles I’m a part of (POC, Ministers, Lefty Anarcho Syndicalists) within the Unitarian Universalist world, General Assembly is getting a full wrap up discussion.  On the subject of ID Checks at GA, required due to the Ft Lauderdale Convention Center being within a Homeland Security Zone…folks are reporting varied experiences from the easy “they didn’t even check my ID”, to “they were waiting to take me away.”  It seems a lot of folks appreciated the GA Chaplain Presence at the Security Gate (now risen to a UU Historical Event – aka, ‘were you there at the Gates?’ will be heard at future meetings I’m certain).  Many folks did also comment on feeling a bit humiliated, frustrated, and at times scared with the constant government surveillance of our little religious gathering.

Footnote: Interestingly, I learned that the great State of Vermont, which we have a special kinship with as Oregonians, still permits State ID without Photo in circulation.  Some of the Homeland Security Agents had an issue with that.

I Like Celebratory Behavior in Worship

2 July 2008 at 13:16

After experiencing another UU GA Worship with admonishments for celebratory behavior in worship, my heart is even sadder.  I’ve already heard the criticisms of young children’s voices taking away from worship.  I’d love to see a rock band on the dias every day!  I did love singing in the Service of the Living Tradition Choir this year with fellow ministers.  My tenor voice needs some improvement on the high D and above notes though.

Tyson "Homosexual" Wins 100!

2 July 2008 at 12:09

The conservative American Family Association’s policy of replacing “Gay” with “Homosexual” took a hilarious hit this week when it replaced American Sprinter Tyson Gay’s last name.

Tyson Homosexual was a blur in blue, sprinting 100 meters faster than anyone ever has…”It means a lot to me,” the 25-year-old Homosexual said.  “I’m glad my body could do it, because now I know I have it in me.

Not only is this totally rude, but isn’t there an ethical rule against changing the content of copyright stories?  Says Fred Jackson, news director of OneNewsNow which manages the “Gay-Homosexual Filter”, “The G word he said, has been “co-opted by a particular group of people.”  I say “How extremist!”

Tiny Sabin HydroPark

2 July 2008 at 00:41

My 8 year old told me about a new HydroPark near his elementary school.  I was thinking a huge waterworks with fountains, fun interactive water toys and maybe a wading pool.  Instead, I found this short YouTube clip of the pocket park in NE Portland.

Another 2 Month Hiatus Completed

1 July 2008 at 15:39

Like Quincy Jones, I’m Back on the Block.  Hopefully third time is a charm.  Got radicalhapa.com registered, and moved the site over to the free wordpress.com from typepad.  Looks like I’ll lose my photos with posts, but for now, was able to get all my posts transferred over.

I’ve been posting more regularly within my Facebook community.  That is a great feature, including the ability to “tag” friends.  Seems that most of my close friends are on facebook, and I’m beginning to buy into the philosophy that there is no need to check email, just facebook messages, at least for personal correspondence.  I did get an earful about the privacy concerns of facebook while at UU Ministry Days in Ft Lauderdale.  The main issue being that we lose ownership rights to the material posted.  Something to be mindful about.

Now that I’m at a time in my life where I’ll be primarily a stay-at-home parent, look for me to blog more regularly.

From Pig-Headed to Bull-Headed to Mule-Headed...

21 May 2008 at 10:05
Today's lead was a simple one: "Despite being trounced in the Oregon primary, Hillary Clinton won't throw in the towel yet." Why? Who cares? It's embarrassing. For EVERYONE. And it really misses the point. This election isn't about who can win, or even who deserves to to be the nominee. It's about turning around eight years of disastrous policy fiascos that have even die-hard, died-in-the-wool multi-generation Republicans shaking their heads in shame and wondering what has become of the Grand Old Party they once new and loved. It's going to take leadership, but it's also going to take teamwork, and the best efforts and contributions of everyone who loves this country and what it stands for to put it right again.

Which is why I'm so mystified by Mrs. Clinton. Does she honestly believe that the ONLY position she is qualified to play in this next administration is QB 1? I've got news you Ma'am, and I"m sorry to have to be the one to share it. But most coaches I know only have one position on their team for a "team player" with THAT kind of attitude. It's warming the splinters at the far end of the bench....

UU Sri Lankan Minister Coming to America!

5 May 2008 at 21:21

I am so excited to report that one of my mentors and good friends from my student ministry with the UU Church of the Philippines received his Visa to travel to America this summer.  He will be at GA, and will be visiting several UU congregations across the states.  We’ll hopefully have him in Portland for a spell.

Rev. Nihal Attanayake is a former Anglican Priest from Sri Lanka, and new President of the UU Church of the Philippines.  He has been staff director of the Faith in Action Department for nearly a decade, leading church building, partner church, and very innovative social enterprise efforts including microfinance.

Getting a Visa to America from the Philippines, or anywhere in SE Asia for that matter, is so Freakin Hard.  I’m so excited and a little surprised.

Co-Ministers

5 May 2008 at 21:16

My generation is stepping up into the co-ministry.  Congratulations!

I-5 Bridge: Community Feedback Time

5 May 2008 at 20:50

I5_bridge
For years now, government, business and community have been planning to make major changes to the Interstate 5 bridge spanning the Columbia River between Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA.  Environmental Justice activists have been monitoring the situation from nearly the beginning.  There has been some concern about the emphasis on adding more vehicle lanes, and efforts to make it the only alternative to "do nothing".  Still, public officials continue to voice the expectation that the MAX Light Rail will cross.  As a resident nearby, I certainly hope so!

There are 3 Options: #1 No Build – keep the same.  #2 Expand with Rapid Bus.  #3 Expand with Light Rail.   My vote is for (they call them Alternatives) #3.

Anyway, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been released.  Deadline to give feedback: July 1st, 2008.  It is all available on the web.  Highlights include:

  • The affected area impacts "EJ Populations".  This is a term I haven’t seen in policy documents before, but it refers to low income and communities of color.  There is a chapter on "Neighborhoods and Environmental Justice".  Most of the poverty is in Washington, racial minorities in Oregon (Kenton Neighborhood).  Check out their maps.
  • Condemnation or "taking" of private property will mostly occur on the Washington side, and some in Oregon’s Hayden Island.  Appendix D outlines the "Potential Property Acquisitions".  Always a hot issue that turns out folks.
  • Long term they expect air quality to improve.  Even without factors such as toll and mass transit.  CO emissions have dropped steadily over the last 20 years.  This was a major concern of EJ activists.

Leave feedback online or attend one of their upcoming Open Houses May 28-29.

UU in Week of Asian/POC Space

3 May 2008 at 10:22

It has been a busy week of community activism.

Last weekend we attended the Filipino-Environmental film Moonrise Film Festival.  My partner was a key organizer, with filipinos and a group new to me – Green Empowerment.  Their program staff who spent time working on water and power issues in rural Filipino villages was very impressive. 

Monday we attended a Mayorial Candidate roundtable with Community of Color delegates from 4 primary groups – Center for Intercultural Organizing, Oregon Action, Latino Network, and the Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon-PAC.  We’ve been involved with the latter, code named APANO-PAC.  Sho Dozono and Sam Adams were invited to meet with about 50 leaders of color.  We had simultaneous Spanish language translation, very impressive!  The first 3 groups are a part of an innovate City of Portland organizing effort to build stronger relationships with communities of color.  Code named: Diversity and Civic Leadership, it is being managed largely by an old friend and organizer Jeri Williams out of the Office of Neighborhood Involvement.

Then Friday was a whirlwind!  I was on local community radio, KBOO 90.7 in Portland, for a Hapa Issues roundtable, talking about Mixed Asian American identity with several good friends.  Professor Patty Duncan of Portland State moderated.  There was a fabulous interview with Kip Fullbeck, who did a wonderful book entitled Part Asian, 100% Hapa, and has Project Hapa online.  It is a great compilation of photos and persons self-written racial-cultural-ethnic identities.  He collected over 1200!  All voluntary.  All self-identified.

Afterwards, a brief baby viewing trip to Western States Center, and then the baby and I went to the monthly gathering of YEPOC (Young Environmental Professionals of Color).  Mostly API folks there, we made some really nice connections in our first visit.

Finally, this morning, to top it all off, we’re co-organizing a half day API Vote Training at the NW Health Foundation for activists from several of Portland’s Asian communities.  I’m doing some relationship building exercises and childcare, but excited to be with a new cohort of organizers.  This is being sponsored by APANO-PAC, and we’re working with leaders from the Viet, Cambodian, Filipino, Chinese and Korean communities.

A Perpetual Distraction

2 May 2008 at 19:45
I suppose one of the great advantages of being hospitalized for over a month is that it creates the perfect excuse for disengaging from the 24/7 news cycle.  I decided a long time ago that I wasn't going to get too excited about the primary season, but would simply wait until November to vote for whoever the Democrats happened to nominate.  With so many excellent candidates available, and the Republicans stuck recycling retreads, I felt like I could have been happy with just about any of the Democratic choices, although I still feel that the strongest ticket the Democrats might have nominated this year would have been Gore/Edwards.  

But between the historic candidacies of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, 2008 seemed destined to produce something very different.  In fact, just before I went into the hospital I found myself hoping for a dream ticket of Obama/Clinton, which would combine the exciting, youthful charismatic vision of the first African American President with the seasoned experience of the former First Lady and Junior Senator from New York.  All it would have taken is for Hillary to recognize that the mood of the nation was moving in a different direction, and to set aside her own personal ambitions for the sake of the country....

But a funny thing happened on the way to the Convention.  And this sideshow over Jeremiah Wright typifies everything that is wrong with our electoral process in general, and with the Democratic party in particular.  

But first just a simple observation.  If agreeing with everything that the preacher has to say is a requirement for remaining a member of a particular church, most of us would be preaching to pretty sparse congregations.  The prophetic voice is not the voice of reason and moderation; it is a voice which speaks out loudly for those who are not able to speak out for themselves, and which attempts to speak THAT truth to power.  Of course the preacher should be outrageous.  Outrage is our stock in trade; if you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention.

Politics, on the other hand, are about the art of the possible, and creating coalitions of compromise that can move the country forward toward the 80% that we can all agree on.  In politics, idealism must always be tempered by realism, and the willingness to settle for the partial good.  But when "electability" begins to trump vision and purpose, and the conversation is all about the horse race rather than the policies, and candidates are pilloried for daring to express a controversial idea out loud....well, it's outrageous in a different way.  A much more dangerous way.

So, cross my fingers and support Barack, or hold my nose and vote for Hillary?  Or pray that the superdelegates come to their senses, and ask Al Gore and John Edwards to pick up the mantle of leadership, and rescue their party from the politics of personal destruction....

Where are those pain pills when I need them?

Cute Sleeping Pose (Pic)

1 May 2008 at 22:56

Just like her sister.
Img_6701

Future DJ

1 May 2008 at 22:47

We love Rock Band!
Img_0454

Advertisements

Walk About Farraguat Park (Piedmont Neighborhood)

1 May 2008 at 21:31

Beautiful afternoon.  We love this garden up the street.  Softball in the park.  This stone wall look is common around our block.

Img_6690 Img_6694

UU Rev. Tse Honored by Harvard

1 May 2008 at 11:25

Scan0001Received my annual invitation to graduation and alumni/ae activities at Harvard Divinity School.  Great to see old friend and activist Rev. Karen Tse of International Bridges to Justice being honored with their First Decade Award.  I can’t believe it has been 10 years since she graduated from HDS!

Karen has put her vision as a lawyer and minister into work in starting an amazing global NGO.  The UUWorld did a nice piece on her recently (Spirited Defender).  Karen, if you’re reading, Miyka loved the keyboard you got her!

Thanks PNWD Ministers

30 April 2008 at 23:57

I got a nice "baby congratulations" card today in the mail, from the ministers gathered at the spring retreat.  It was sweet!  Love the collegiality here.  Thanks to Rev. Maginn for the yummy vege stew and fabulous garlic bread.  Rev. Pomerantz, I promise to take you up on time with the kids!  Thanks Rev. Ayer for sending the card along.
Pnwd

Hawai'i Siege?

30 April 2008 at 23:49

HawaiiseigeA tourist destination, the former political and cultural seat of native hawai’i, has been taken over by 60 activists.  News is just coming out.  Another occupation, in the mold of the 1960’s?

Go Hawai'ians!

30 April 2008 at 23:43

Link: Native Group Occupies Grounds of Palace – New York Times.

HONOLULU (AP) — A group of Native Hawaiians on Wednesday locked the gates of Iolani Palace, the former home of Hawaiian royalty, and took over the grounds.

I’ll try and get more news from my network of friends.  Until then, check out this great group of API singers from Hawai’i – Kupa’aina.  An amigo from UO plays in the group, we heard them last year at one of Portland’s only Hawai’ian hotspots, Bamboo Grove in SW.

Baby in Arms

28 April 2008 at 14:22

Img_6633Iyara in her first week.

UUA Power Ratings

28 April 2008 at 14:04

If there was to be a UUA Power Rating, what criteria would you use?

Influence – financial, theological, organizational?
Connections, established network?
Professional credentials (oh so very UU)?
Written work?
Reputation?
Congregational leadership?

Baby Shibashi

28 April 2008 at 09:41

Img_0512
Img_0519

Img_0515

Taiko Redux?

27 April 2008 at 18:11

39732

Advertisements

Hella Diverse Seder

27 April 2008 at 18:04

Haggadah_cover
We attended a Jewish Seder for the second year in a row with a progressive Jewish friend here in Portland.  He made his own Haggadah, as many do.  We were a dozen, from a dozen different racial backgrounds.  It was a long and beautiful Seder, with some amazing passages pulled together for the ritual.  Wine as a part of the experience was clearly affected the mood. 

One of the culturally Jewish guys there, who grew up practicing a Conservative Seder, commented on how engaged everyone was.  How it wasn’t about waiting to be done.  He mentioned how he has a classic photo of his father, at a Seder, looking at his watch.

We left full, of both vegetarian and chicken matza ball soup.  We left enriched by the connecting, and reflection on liberation.  I don’t have a copy of the Haggadah to share (yet), but there is another wonderful Haggadah called "Love and Justice" in times of war by Dara Silverman and Micah Bazant.  Dara has been a keynote speaker at UU Young Adult conferences in the past, and is connected with a fellow radical Jewish UU who served the Continental UU Young Adult network for many years.

Full Body Worship

27 April 2008 at 17:55

I’ve been wondering if ever there was a UU group that engaged in full body worship.  That is, worship with regular physical rituals.  I know we’re not a religion that is often "on its knees", or letting our body go to the spirit in ways common to other traditions.  I experienced a little of this with the UU Faith Healers in the Philippines, generally elders who practiced a form of shaman ism in the rural villages, some who were also "ordained" UU ministers with the UU Church of the Philippines.  In some of their rituals, they held their patient amidst a crowd and made prayers and ministrations where the patient seemed to let go in a full body way.

Among young adults, we experimented for several years with Techno Cosmic worship, thanks to Rev. Thomas Anastasi of Shoreline UU.  I heard that his congregation also build a sweet sanctuary fit for such movement and full body inspired worship.  I haven’t been yet.

Baby!

26 April 2008 at 17:49

Dsc02448

Knowing Thy Neighbors

26 April 2008 at 09:44

I’ve been getting to know my neighborhood better over the last month.
Piedmont_map

We live in North Portland, right on the edge of Northeast.  This is the same neighborhood where my father grew up.  In fact the Piedmont Neighborhood Association meets at the Catholic Parish and School where my dad and grandfather were active – Holy Redeemer.

I walked about 10 blocks around my house last month with the kids to get to know folks, and to extend an invitation to a Mayorial Candidate house forum we had at our home.  A lot of beautiful craftsman style houses, tall, squat homes.  A lot of fences and barking dogs.  The part of the neighborhood where I live is one of the more isolated nooks, as we are bounded by the Interstate 5 freeway on the West, the train tracks to the North, and the Vancouver Ave Bridge to the East.  We’ve got to go up to N Lombard to go anywhere. 

We live close to the Farraguat Park, a beautiful and quiet spot next to the former Applegate Elementary which was closed a few years ago during the massive Portland schools closures and K-8 schools development.  The gangsters who used to dominate the place are no longer.  And while it is not busy like our main neighborhood park – Penninsula – with their rose gardens, community center, pool and great BBQ spots, it is a perfect place to practice sports, bicycle with the kids, and has a nice playground.

FYI – There is a neighborhood clean-up this weekend, free drop-off for all your great junk at the church on 7412 N Mississippi for all you Portland area folks with junk to get rid of.

Travel to the Philippines by the Numbers

26 April 2008 at 09:34

Airplane

We’re making our last major family trip to the Philippines for the foreseeable future given the high cost of travel.  It will be a big reunion for all of us after spending last year there, me as a student minister with the UU Church of the Philippines.  I did go back in February briefly, and was impressed to see the growing numbers of the Metro Manila/Quezon City UU group that I helped ground, and the urban poor fellowship of Bicutan.

Here are some of the numbers that we’ve  been pondering in preparation for the trip:

  • 1 new baby, born April 9.
  • 5 business days needed to receive new passport.
  • $180 dollars needed to expedite and express ship the new passport.
  • 4 round-trip plane tickets, 2-stop, using the last of my 240,000 United Airline miles.
  • 10% of full fare plus taxes for the infant seat – roughly $400.
  • 12 bags allowed, 2 per fare passenger, 3 for me as I’m a United Premier 1K, and 1 for the infant.
  • 840lb of luggage allowed, including 50lb promised to UU Philippines for books, 10lb for rice to a family friend, and several hundred pounds of gifts.
  • 10% Value-Added Tax potentially applied to all imported gifts.
  • 1 used electronic per returning Filipino citizen allowed (we’re planning to bring an LCD TV).
  • 2 in-country trips planned, to Dumaguete and Bohol.

UU Groundwork Headline

26 April 2008 at 01:59

The UU Youth and Young Adult Anti-Racism Collective, aka Groundwork, has successfully established a "spokecouncil" to better manage the organization.  In addition, we’re hosting bi-weekly calls, one business, one support/social.  Erik Kesting from the UUA Young Adult and Campus Ministry Office is providing administrative assistance.  Mimi LaValley is helping identify and assign trainers – something both Laurel Albina and I were doing in the past.

We’ve had a surge of energy this year, thanks to the Training of Trainers in May 2007 that brought another dozen activists into our midst.

Upcoming, we’re leading various programs at GA, District Assemblies, and conferences.

DRUUMM Newsletter Starts Back Up

26 April 2008 at 01:55

The DRUUMM Steering Committee has authorized me to start back up a regular DRUUMM communique.  I’m preparing the first "e-news" for May 1st, which will go out monthly.  The first print newsletter, what will probably be a twice annual, will be available at GA.  Sign up at www.druumm.org

Cute New Baby Pic

26 April 2008 at 00:11

1919162_img

Moonrise Film Festival Kicks Off

26 April 2008 at 00:10

Aimee and I went to the Holladay Park Plaza by Lloyd Center this evening for a special banquet and screening of Batad, a Filipino Cinemalayan film.  One of Aimee’s old friends Erwin had a cool cameo in the beginning…a story of belonging to an indigenous tribe told from the point of view of a youth.  A little slow at times, there was good comedy as he seeks his first pair of shoes.
Banue
   

It was shot in beautiful banue in the famous Batad Rice Terraces.  Speaking of which, there was a front page Oregonian article today about the incredible price of rice – nearly $1000 for 100lb of the international standard Thai White B rice.  This is starting to create some real havoc overseas, not as much locally, but in places like California with lots of Asians eating rice, it is a problem at places like Costco.

There will be several more films Saturday.  I reached out to my Filipino neighbors across the street, the grandma is going to come tommorow.  I also dropped off some of the yummy (so I’m told), Bistek and Chicken Adobo food.

There was some serious organizing going on this evening, with a good intergenerational crowd.  Some of the youth got organized through a Tagalog language class taught at Portland State last year, that was awesome to learn about.  There were elders that Aimee organzied.  I met several folks from a new group that I want to get more involved with – YEPOC – young environmental professionals of color activists.  It is gathering up some of the old Portland EJAG (environmental justice action group) friends that I used to be active with before I went to Harvard.

Bring Free WiFi to NE Portland!

22 April 2008 at 14:13

I’m upset that the designers of the Portland Free WiFi have chosen to start providing the coverage in the richest parts of town – SW and SE Portland.  I see a budding effort in St Johns/far North, but NOTHING in the inner N/NE Portland.

Check out the coverage map – it is like internet red-lining.  Made more frustrating by the fact that the tax-payer program may be disconnected.

Advertisements

UU's Not Spiritually Grounded Enough for POC?

22 April 2008 at 09:04

The title question is mine, and inspired from reading UUA President Bill Sinkford who gave a nice interview in Tampa Bay.  His excerpt about why more Blacks are not Unitarian Universalist caught my eye.  His "standard response" is actually something I’d like to see expanded on a bit more – that inviting persons of color for the purpose of whites feeling better is not spiritually grounded. 

I have generally found myself in agreement with Sinkford’s analysis of racism despite different hopes about the UUA effort.   While probably not new, I was discussing with several ministerial colleagues the linkage of our spiritual grounding to racial diversity as a barrier for welcoming any newcomers.  This makes me cheer the ongoing releases of the Tapestry of Faith curricula for Unitarian Universalist formation, many of which are being made available online.  I’d also like to see a growth in the collectivizing and mentorship of younger persons of color in our faith. 

Indeed it is tokenizing and ultimately marginalizing to invite POC into UU churches solely based on race.  In this, I understand Sinkford’s point. 

Your thoughts on where our spiritual grounding needs to develop in order for our religious home to be a place welcoming of persons of color?

Maxwell: Although the UUA had more ministers in the civil
rights movement, including the march from Selma to Montgomery with Dr.
Martin Luther King, why does the UUA have such a hard time attracting
black members today?

Sinkford: That’s probably the most
commonly asked question I get as I travel extensively in the United
States to our congregations. My standard response is that for a faith
community that is still predominantly white, it is not spiritually
grounded to go out and try to acquire a few more dark faces so that the
white members of the congregation feel better about themselves.

First,
we have to look back in history. There was a time — in the 1960s
particularly — when a significant number of African-Americans joined
our congregations, and it was based entirely on the kind of public
witness for civil rights. Our ministers were out in public. They were
leading demonstrations. As you suggested a moment ago, hundreds of our
ministers went to Selma to march with Dr. King. We were clearly a group
of allies in the struggle, and many persons of color came, checked out
our congregations and found them welcoming spiritual communities and
joined.

In 1968, 1969 and 1970, there was what most of us
experienced as a retreat. In 1968, the Unitarian Universalist
Association had made a commitment to reparations for the black
community, even before the call for reparations was made. Many of us
were buoyed and enthusiastic that this was a continuation of that
witness for justice. But things got complicated. The reaction to that
commitment was controversial in the Unitarian Universalist
congregations, and finances were tight. And so that commitment, it was
then a million dollars, was never fulfilled. Only half of it was ever
paid.

And the reaction of many persons of color in our movement
was, and I am among them, was one of a deep sense of betrayal. You
know, this was a faith community that offered us so much hope, and for
that commitment to be withdrawn was more than I could tolerate. And it
actually led me to leave Unitarian Universalism for a number of years.

A
second reason for the difficulty in attracting people of color has to
do with where our congregations are located. In the period of the rapid
development of the suburbs, many of our downtown congregations elected
to move out into essentially lily-white, often legally lily-white,
suburban communities. And so it’s really no surprise for those
congregations that they don’t have a significant number of people of
color there. And I preach this, as well. You have to look at the
decisions you’ve made and the impacts those decisions have on who’s
able to be present.

The third thing is that Unitarian
Universalists are the most highly educated people in the United States,
and much of our worship came to be dominated by the intellect rather
than by the heart. One of the things happening now in Unitarian
Universalism is that we’re reclaiming some of that heart, and I think
that opens us to membership by a broader range of persons. We’re not
just the crowd of university professors and the terminally overeducated
folks anymore.

The Resurrection and the Life

21 March 2008 at 14:54
My apologies for having to share such private and personal news in such a public and impersonal way, but one of the few drawbacks of being blessed with so many good friends is that the task of trying to contact all of you individually is simply overwhelming. A few weeks ago I went to see my physician after waking up in the middle of the night and noticing that I was coughing up blood. A subsequent chest x-ray and other diagnostic testing revealed a malignant tumor approximately the size of a tennis ball in my right lung. Obviously, I would have much rather learned that I had just won the Powerball Jackpot, but the good news is that even though this cancer is relatively advanced, it can still be treated. And so I'm scheduled to begin my chemotherapy the week after Easter. I've also started a "cancer blog" at http://onedayisle.blogspot.com which I hope you will all take the time to visit and explore. And please leave your comments and good wishes. I look forward to hearing from you!

Tim

Profoundly Important Easter Update

19 March 2008 at 02:10
My apologies for having to share such private and personal news in such a public and impersonal way, but one of the few drawbacks of being blessed with so many good friends is that the task of trying to contact all of you individually is simply overwhelming. A few weeks ago I went to see my physician after waking up in the middle of the night and noticing that I was coughing up blood. A subsequent chest x-ray and other diagnostic testing revealed a malignant tumor approximately the size of a tennis ball in my right lung. Obviously, I would have much rather learned that I had just won the Powerball Jackpot, but the good news is that even though this cancer is relatively advanced, it can still be treated. And so I'm scheduled to begin my chemotherapy the week after Easter. I've also started a "cancer blog" at http://onedayisle.blogspot.com which I hope you will all take the time to visit and explore. And please leave your comments and good wishes. I look forward to hearing from you!

Tim

Hometown Former Div III Portland State Goes NCAA!

13 March 2008 at 00:11

Gotta have some pride in my hometown Portland State Vikings, who never played my Oregon Ducks when I was a Duckster in the early 90’s.  They were Division 3, but now they have moved up to Big Sky, and just took the Tournament!

Thanks to the Vikings, who I last was into when Curtis Delgado was Running Back in the 1980’s, I’m now aware that the NCAA Selection Sunday is this coming Sunday.  Whoo hoo.

Banana's and Radical UU Music

11 March 2008 at 19:02

Eating a bowl of banana’s while I wait for the family to return for din din.  Stumbled back upon my old friend Mimi Lavalley’s Myspace and listened to some of her punk folk rock music.  Check it out (The Meems).

Mimi worked at the UUA with me, and has been one of our visionary justice making youth activists.

Seven Habits of Highly Ineffective Churches

8 March 2008 at 10:03

Hilarious, and completely relevant.  Here are the first 4.  From the Seattle Post-Intelliger and I believe on the UCC.org website.

Link: Articles of Faith: Seven habits of highly ineffective churches.

1. Elevate mediocrity to a spiritual discipline. Figure out where average falls and aim below there. Doing things with excellence, joy and flair may make someone uncomfortable. God doesn’t really expect much anyhow.

2. Take no risks. A successful practice of risk avoidance is often best
achieved by sending any and all new ideas to a minimum of four boards
or committees who understand it’s their role to say no to any new
ideas. This process may need to be reinforced by remarks noting how a
particular idea might make the church liable, cost money or ruffle
feathers.

3. Practice the following evangelism strategy: "If they want us, they
know where to find us." Assume that everyone does know where you are
and what you are. It also can be helpful if your building looks like a
medieval fortress. If you don’t have that going for you, encourage
ushers and greeters to look like palace guards as they perform their
role.

4. Blame early and often. Maintaining dysfunction in a congregation is
made easier if scapegoats are regularly identified. In some
congregations, ministers make wonderful scapegoats. You may also blame
"newcomers," or "people who don’t understand how we do things in this
church." If all else fails, blame the conference, the denomination or
Satan.

50/50 on Stuff White People Like

5 March 2008 at 17:13

ChaliceChick seems to be the first UU Blogger to note the comedic and hard hitting site Stuff White People Like.  I learned about it first from RaceWire, then back tracked (Alex Jung Feb 29).  Jung does a nice 1-2 punch, affirming its inspiring its effort to develop "a critique to the colorblind Lexus liberal rather than the raving skinhead", yet criticizing that it’s "cleverness is getting stale because it hasn’t exhibited ways to think differently."  Seems to be getting a lot of attention, and it was fun to take an initial look.

CC noted that she found herself 50/50 on the different items posted (I’m Sure I’m Taking This Too Seriously Feb 26).
In terms of taking it seriously, it made me think about the philosophy
of community organizer Saul Alinsky.  He was a strong advocate of using
parody and humor to illuminate the injustices of the world.  To create
a situation where those on top look immature and/or ridiculous if they
try to be defensive or counter-attack, and it strikes that special
funny bone virtually everyone else.

These humor tools in social justice are needed more and more.  We seem
to have gotten quite serious, at least during my youth and young adult
years.  While I haven’t found a lot of hilarious sites that address
economic justice, there are a number that address race that I’ve
loved.  Check out my local Portland blogger and artist Damali Ayo as a nice example.  She recently did a fantastic panhandling for reparations
in downtown Portland OR that got some great media coverage.  These
things really break through our consciousness, especially in this era
of total saturation and a lot of apathy.

UU Ministers of Color Gather in California

5 March 2008 at 16:38

Dozens of UU Ministers of Color and several other religious professionals (Seminarians and DRE’s I believe) are gathering in Northern California for a weekend of caucusing, community-building and dialogue.  This is the 2nd year of this evolving initiative, coordinated and organized out of the UUA Identity Based Ministries Staff Group.  There have been other efforts before this, but this particular event seems to be taking root as an annual program, fully funded by the UUA, with a commitment to maintain it long-term.  Very exciting!

New UUA Director of Ministry Beth Miller (uuworld.org introduction) is expected to join us for part of the retreat.  On the agenda is talking about a possible support system for seminarians of color.  As one of the organizers of seminarians of color over the last 4 years, this is a wonderful development (being led I believe by the UUA Diversity of Ministry Team, or DOMT).  The UU World Magazine gave some insight into the charge of this UUA committee (Sinkford Outlines Plan for More Diverse Ministry Feb 6, 2007).

We’re back in the general area of where DRUUMM was founded in 1997-1998 by a similar configuration of religious professionals of color.  They were called together by the African American UU Ministries, Latino UU Networking Association, and UUA Staff of Color.  While I was not there, it is worth noting that UUA Presidential Candidate Rev Peter Morales wrote at least one of the general invitation letters that I reviewed while researching my Harvard Thesis on A 25 Year History of Unitarian Universalist People of Color 1980-2005.

Top Justice Priorities of Young UU's

28 February 2008 at 18:21

Reading the recent reports about the Record High Number of Americans in Prison, reminded me of the intense and meaningful efforts by the youth to understand and act for prison justice issues.  From my experience at the UUA, here were the top justice priorities of young UU’s (youth and young adults):

1. Accessibility – physically accessible conference sites, dietary issues, child care for young adult events, economic cost particularly for young adult events.
2. Gender and Sexual Orientation – transgender education, gender dynamics among staff and volunteers, Our Whole Lives curricula for young adults, activism with UU Women’s Federation and Interweave.
3. Globalization – the Seattle WTO protests, Washington DC IMF protests, presence within various global justice movements domestically and overseas.
4. Anti-War – School of the America’s Watch, including young people serving time for protesting in Columbus Georgia, and the Peacemaking Initiative coming out of GA.
5. Racial Justice – Groundwork Youth and Young Adult Anti-Racism Trainer Collective, now on hiatus Transformation Team for Youth and Young Adults, training, adoptee panel at GA, support for young adults of color.

Is Your UU Church in a Historic Sundown Town?

28 February 2008 at 17:55

I checked out Dr. James Lowen’s Sundown Town Database, and contributed to my hometown’s history.  Oregon was something of a Sundown State as far as I’m concerned.  Still seems to be in some parts unfortunately.  Nice UU World article about all this.  GA has featured Dr. Lowen in the past.

UU's Rev's I'd Love In A Room Together

27 February 2008 at 10:20

Over the last 10 years I’ve had the privilege of networking among UU youth and young adults around the world.  I haven’t met everyone I’d like to see in a room together, but I’ve met, worked with, and encouraged many of them in their ministry – and been encouraged back.  There is something special about this generation, our access to communication, information, and our taking leadership in the soon-to-be Baby Boom vacuum.

From Transylvannia, there is a small group of former youth activists, among them David Gyero and Lazi Scabo, both ministers now.  David may be the future Bishop.

From England there is Aaron Brown, who is one of the few young ministers, and a wonderful bass player.

In the Khasi Hills, Darihun Khriam and Derek Pariat are two who are leading their Unitarian Union into the new milenia.  Darihun is the first woman minister.

UU Philippines has two excellent women young ministers, Susan Quisel and Elvie Sienes, along with Elvie’s husband Persie Sienes and his minister brother Pere.

In Canada the only young adult minister I know well is Laura Friedman, who was a sexy sister performing artist when I was a youth, and is someone who has felt the call to minister with young folks and on the margins.  Nice hat at the SLT last year!

In the USA is where I know so many…Marlin Lavanhar has travelled many of these places and already knows a number of folks.  Plus, a congregation I visited in remote Negros Islands, Philippines, remarked at how he tried the local perro delicacy!  Marlin gave me one of my first books on the Khasi Hills as well.  Spokes to Spokane was just his last leg of biking around the world.  Alison Miller has been to Transylvannia and led the UUA at virtually every level of young adult and campus ministry.  Kristin Harper is the first in a lot of areas, and helped motivate a whole generation of young UU’s of color (including me).

Actually, I prefer the Bavarian Creme....

22 February 2008 at 17:35
And I drink my Dunkin Donuts coffee black, or with cream only.

I can actually still remember the first time I ordered coffee and a doughnut at the Dunkin Donuts store on Boylston Street, just down the block from the Massachusetts Historical Society.

"Regular?" the clerk asked, and when I said yes (assuming, being from Seattle, regular coffee meant black coffee) and got it back with cream and two sugars....

Just another small moment of culture shock from the summer of 1980....(and for what it's worth, this quiz has me typed with a capital "T")




You Are a Boston Creme Donut



You have a tough exterior. No one wants to mess with you.

But on the inside, you're a total pushover and completely soft.

You're a traditionalist, and you don't change easily.

You're likely to eat the same doughnut every morning, and pout if it's sold out.

European Dream

19 February 2008 at 15:33
One of the waitresses at the local restaurant where I like to eat breakfast is going to Paris next month with her boyfriend, who now has a little cash in his pocket having just given up his dream of becoming a rock musician, and selling his guitars on e-Bay. So I wrote up a little itinerary of Ten Days in (and around) Paris for a Young Couple in Love and now would like to invite others to read and add your comments.

Also, if you keep scrolling down you're also welcome to read the letters I wrote while living abroad for a semester as a visiting Doctoral Fellow at Aalborg University in Denmark in 2000.

A Seldom Appreciated Ancillary Benefit of a Good Seminary Education

19 February 2008 at 13:47
On Monday nights the neighborhood sports bar around the corner from my apartment hosts a "trivia night," where patrons can win up to $40 in free food in what amounts to a two hour contest between teams of up to six members to answer more questions correctly than anyone else in the bar, all in an attempt to sell more beer and buffalo wings now that Monday Night Football is over for the season. Last Monday I wandered in just to catch a bite to eat, ran into a couple of friends I'd met watching the World Series last October, and we decided to form a team...and finished just out of the money (mostly I think because we were being so convivial we weren't really concentrating on the "game" part of the quiz).

So we decided that we would meet up again this week with our game faces on, and see whether we could be a little more competitive than we were on our first night out. Unfortunately though, both of my team mates stood me up, which meant that I had to take on the entire bar all by myself....

You can see where this is going, right?

Yes, it's true -- all by his lonesome the good Reverend Doctor gave all comers a sound intellectual thrashing, blowing away the competition with his obscure knowledge of history, geography, science, pop culture, literature, movies, mythology and yes, even Rock and Roll trivia (I mean, did YOU know that Jimi Hendrix served in the 101st Airborne division before making Rock and Roll history at Woodstock?). In fact, they even tell me I set a new record high score, with 108 out of 142 possible points. And the worst part is, I know if my team mates had been there with me, we probably could have scored at least another dozen...and perhaps as many as 20. I'm sure one of THEM would have known the difference between the chemical names for Prozac and Viagra.

Of course, even as I bask in the glow of my triumph, there's a little voice whispering in my ear "Do you really need to eat another $40 worth of beer and wings? Do you really need to eat another $40 worth of beer and wings...."

Choosing to Blog Again

18 February 2008 at 20:36

It has been nearly 9 months since I gave up active blogging.  It was a conscious decision, minus any public fanfare.  I still read other UU blogs occasionally.  Yet the time has come that I found the energy to start blogging again.

I gave it up in part with my return to the USA from the Philippines, passing the Ministerial Fellowship Committee, and transitioning out of the UUA and into local community development work.  The backlash from several influential folks related to the article about my ministerial fellowshipping at GA also contributed.

There are some huge shifts in the UU landscape that I look forward to contributing to:

1) UUA Presidential Elections
2) Identity Politics
3) Leadership and Structure within Youth and Young Adult communities
4) Activism
5) Campaign for a Spiritual Anthology

Thanks to all who keep our voice alive in this medium.  I look forward to joining you again.

Advertisements

Happy Danes!

18 February 2008 at 13:44
Just finished watching a "60 Minutes" interview with Tal Ben-Shahar, Harvard's "Professor of Happiness" who teaches a course for undergraduates on Positive Psychology that apparently fills Saunders Theater every semester. I've been a big admirer of Martin Seligman's theory of "Learned Optimism" (along with the entire closely-related Cognitive Therapy movement at Penn) from almost the day the book was originally published, so it's kind of exciting to see the movement gaining such widespread popularity. And I'm particularly delighted to learn that Danes tend to be the happiest people in the "developed" world. Those clever Danes. Despite having the highest suicide rate in the world (and all without a handgun to be found anywhere in the country), they really do know how to have a good time.

Here are Tal Ben-Shahar's "Six Tips for Happiness" (adapted and expanded from an article by Cindy Sher in the JUF (Jewish United Fund/Metro Chicago) News.)

1. Give yourself permission to be human. Embrace painful emotions for what they are, a natural consequence of being alive, rather than trying to suppress or deny them. When we accept emotions such as fear, sadness, or anxiety as natural expressions of being human, we are more likely to be able to integrate them into the larger context of our lives. Rejecting our emotions, positive or negative, leads to frustration and unhappiness. The only people who don't feel emotional pain are sociopaths and the dead.

2. Happiness lies at the intersection between pleasure and meaning. Whether at work or at home, the goal is to engage in activities that are both personally significant and enjoyable. When this is not feasible, make sure you have happiness boosters, moments throughout the week that provide you with both pleasure and meaning. The activities we find both pleasurable and meaningful will vary from person to person, from culture to culture, and even within the same individuals at different stages in their lives. But the importance of healthy pleasure and worthwhile activity remain constant no matter who you are or where you live.

3. Keep in mind that happiness is mostly dependent on our state of mind. Barring extreme circumstances, our level of well-being is determined by what we choose to focus on (the full or the empty part of the glass) and by our interpretation of external events. For example, do we view failure as catastrophic, or do we see it as a survivable learning opportunity which will contribute directly to our eventual success? This is a much more sophisticated idea than simply "the power of positive thinking." How we CHOOSE to frame our experience, by letting go of responsibility for things that are beyond our control, while accepting control of the things we can change (basically, the Serenity Prayer) determines our ability to place failure in context while owning our success. Universalizing the negative ("I'll NEVER be happy") while minimizing positive things (like the importance of healthy relationships) is probably the most significant "thinking error" people make. So do what your mother always told you to do: shake it off, and go find a sympathetic shoulder to cry on until it's out of your system.

4. Simplify! Simplify! Thoreau had this one right two centuries ago. We Americans in particular are generally too busy trying to squeeze in more and more activities into less and less time. Quantity influences quality, and we compromise on our happiness by trying to do it all. It is indeed possible to have too much of a good thing. And even if you could have it all, you wouldn't want it all at once.

5. Remember the mind-body connection. This is the corrective to the most frequent misunderstanding of #3. We are so accustomed to thinking about "mind over matter" and the importance of will-power that we often overlook that the mind-body connection works in both directions. What we do (or don't do) with our bodies influences our state of mind. Regular exercise, adequate sleep, and healthy eating habits lead to both physical and mental health. If you are feeling strong, energetic, and full of life, it is much easier to maintain a positive outlook on the world than it is if you are constantly feeling tired, run-down, and "puny."

6. Express gratitude whenever possible. We too often take our lives for granted. Learn to appreciate and savor the wonderful things in life, from people to food, from nature to a smile. Keep a "gratitude journal" and write in it every night, listing at least five things large or small that you are personally thankful for this day. "Appreciation" is not just the ability to admire something for what it is, it is also the GROWTH that takes place over time as we become more accustomed to wanting the things we have, rather than craving things we see on TV but can never truly possess. Managing our expectations and desires so that they conform with reality, and appreciating life for the miracle that it is (in gratitude, pleasure, and with simply joy rather than resentment, disappointment, and bitter frustration) is the basic secret of True Happiness -- the intersection of Pleasure and Meaning. Americans are notoriously ambitious, competetive, aquisitive and discontent...so it's no wonder that we tend to rank toward the bottom of the happiness scale. We could all learn a lesson from the Danes. Who says high taxes, wind turbines, and socialized, universal health care are bad things?...

TEN DAYS IN (AND AROUND) PARIS FOR A YOU...

15 February 2008 at 00:41
TEN DAYS IN (AND AROUND) PARIS FOR A YOUNG COUPLE IN LOVE (a special Valentine's Day gift for whoever can use it)

[One of the waitresses at the neighborhood restaurant where I like to eat breakfast is going to Paris next month with her boyfriend, who now has a little cash in his pocket having apparently given up his dream of becoming a rock musician, and selling his guitars on e-Bay. These are merely my best suggestions: the things that would top my list if I were the one who had sold my guitars, and was taking a beautiful young woman with me to Europe. You might have to shuffle the schedule around a little depending on the weather, when the museums are open, and the like. You can also cut almost a full day out of the road-trip by traveling to Normandy in the afternoon or early evening the day before...which is basically what I have suggested here anyway. Readers, please add your suggestions too by posting them to the "comments" section!]




DAY ONE: arrive, settle in to your hotel, relax, unpack, find a cozy and intimate neighborhood restaurant with a reasonable prix fixe menu and a good vin ordinaire, enjoy a leisurely meal just like the French do, then go back to the hotel and make love until exhausted....

DAY TWO: wake up early, happy and well rested, then discover your neighborhood Parisian cafe and enjoy a typical Parisian breakfast of a croissant and cafe creme. (You should begin every day in Paris just this way). Explore the neighborhood on foot, or visit one of the many other worthwhile sightseeing destinations listed below.

DAY THREE: Ile de la Cite and the Left Bank: Notre Dame Cathedral, Ile St. Louis, the Latin Quarter, Luxembourg Gardens, Shakespeare and Company, whatever. There’s a great walking tour in the Rick Steves guidebook. After dark jump aboard a Bateaux-Mouches (you can catch them at the base of Pont Neuf) for a romantic, late night cruise along the Seine.

DAY FOUR: the Musee d’ Orsay in the morning; Montemartre and Sacre Cour in the afternoon. Explore the neighborhood, or just sit on the steps and watch the people.

Sacre Couer

DAY FIVE: the Louvre. Yes, you really CAN spend the whole day there, and still only scratch the surface. After you’ve exhausted yourself with great art, (and if you didn’t see it on Day Three) you might want to check out the Conciergerie (where Marie Antoinette was held prisoner before they chopped off her head), or visit one of the other smaller sightseeing destinations. Or better yet, gain almost an entire extra day in the city by traveling to Mont St. Michel in the afternoon instead of waiting until morning. (You can also start in Bayeaux and then travel to Mont St. Michel...but plan on spending one night in each place. Pack as light as you can -- which is good advice in general -- and then leave the rest of your baggage with your hotel concierge in Paris. And make your reservations early!]

Mont St Michel

DAY SIX: (roadtrip) -- Mont St. Michel. Hotel: try Le Mare Poulard. Expensive, but worth it. This is truly one of the most amazing (and inspiring) things in France. Don’t miss it! Arrive the day before, spend the night on the island, get up early (before the tourists start arriving from the mainland) and see as much as you can before the place is overrun by invaders. Go to Mass. Take the self-guided audio tour, or tag along with one of the groups. Catch a late morning or early afternoon train to Bayeaux, and try to see the Bayeaux Tapestry that afternoon, before treating yourself to a lovely Norman dinner at one of Bayeaux’s fine center city hotels.

Point du Hoc

The American Cemetery in Normandy

DAY SEVEN: (roadtrip) Bayeaux. Hotel: I stayed at the Hotel de la Gare (right near the train station), which was cheap, convenient, and had the added bonus of running its own D-Day beach tour (which was great). There is also a fantastic WWII museum in Averanches. When you return from the tour, catch the first train to Versailles. This is where you will really appreciate packing light. Don’t just hang around in the Hall of Mirrors. Get out to see le Hameau and the Triton Palaces. Return to Paris in the evening.

Versailles

The Hall of Mirrors



Le Hameau



DAY EIGHT: This is the bonus day you gain by traveling to Mont St Michel in the afternoon, and only spending a half-day at Versailles. By now you should be feeling like you really own the city, so go out an enjoy it like a native Parisian!

DAY NINE: Shop!

DAY TEN: pack and travel home again....


Other things worth checking out (if you can find the time)

The Conciergerie (already described above)

Les Invalides/French Military Museum/Napolean’s tomb

Rodin Sculpture Museum (near Les Invalides)

The French Sewer Museum! (fascinating)

The Arc de Triomphe and the Champs-Elysées, Place de la Concorde, Jardin des Tuileries, and other "Right Bank" attractions. (another great thing to do if you're feeling overwhelmed by the Louvre).

The view from the top of the Montparnasse Tower (Rick Steves says that the view from the top of Montparnasse is the best in Paris because Montparnasse isn’t in it!)

Pere Lachaise Cemetery. Final resting place of Jim Morrison, among others


Don’t Bother

The Top of the Eiffel Tower: long lines and so what? -- unless you simply want to say you’ve done it. Wouldn’t your rather look AT it?

The Bastille: because there’s nothing there. It’s just a stop on the Metro now; the actual prison was torn down during the Revolution two centuries ago!

The Pompidou Center: the building is probably more interesting than the collection...although, of course, I’m no artist. Rick Steves says that the (free) view from the cafe terrace is excellent.


Favorite Guidebooks:

If you haven't figured it out already, anything (and everything) by Rick Steves. I just love this guy! -- another Seattle boy about my age, who has been traveling independently (and on a limited budget) through Europe's "Back Doors" since he was a teenager, and has now turned his passion not only into a career, but an entire industry. You’ll quickly see that a lot of my own opinions were shaped by his.

Vive La Diffรƒยฉrence!

14 February 2008 at 21:00
a Special Valentine's Day Bonus Cross-Post.

The lovely and talented PeaceBang (who writes a blog, "Beauty Tips for Ministers," that people actually read) recently returned home from her annual mid-winter sunbreak (this year in Florida) lovestruck and with a new SweetieBang in tow, and wrote a lovely soliloquy regarding the successful search for true love at mid-life.

The mysteriously anonymous "Dutch Treat" responded with a weirdly worthy (PB's words, not mine) set of observations expressing a somewhat more cynical and "masculine" point of view, which in turn inspired PB to post one more time about the spiritual discipline of kissing frogs and the enduring search for that elusive brass ring of fidelity and commitment, which ended with a set of Stephen Sondheim lyrics that could have only been more inspiring if PB had actually sung them for us personally.

Now, just for giggles, I've cut and pasted the whole dialogue here (mostly since I couldn't quite figure out how to put in only the appropriate links to the original posts). Enjoy! And let it be known, just for the record, when I take PB out to dinner, I ALWAYS pick up the check.

***
PEACEBANG

The manic mind of the minister -- Auntie Mame meets Cotton Mather. Blogging about Unitarian Universalism, UU Christian spiritual practice, occasional cultural and political ravings, and the inner life of ministry. PeaceBang is the alter ego of a small town pastor serving a historic New England Unitarian Universalist congregation.

Re-entry Mode And Thoughts On Romantic Timing
January 27, 2008 on 6:43 pm

Hello ‘Bangers,

Here’s hoping that you’re all well and staying warm.

I am in re-entry mode after a lovely Florida vacation, courtesy of some very generous friends who gave me and a colleague pal the use of their condo. I’m not officially back to work until Tuesday which is nice and gives me some time to unpack, do the grocery shopping, and to curse the gods for their obnoxious sense of humor.

It’s just that, you see, Cupid got out one of his biggest, baddest arrows while I was away and hit me and a perfectly innocent other party with it, so now there’s a little jet stream of romance mojo moving north and south between Massachusetts and Southern Florida. A convenient 1,555 miles apart, that’s all. Well, we’ll see. And he doesn’t even own a computer, so there’s no chance of him seeing this, in case you were worried.

If you’ve been reading this blog for any amount of time, you’ve been through a few romances with me. Well, let’s say that you’ve been through about 100 bad dates alluded to, sporadic musings on the loneliness of the single life, and many reflections on the special challenges of the single minister.

I have tried not to chronicle every twinge of “gee, I might have met someone special” with my readers — because SisterBang and other pals have always been there to indulge those insecure, ad infinitum ramblings with — and also because no one needs to hear about the ups and downs of a clergywoman’s mostly non-existent dating life and romantic rejections . It’s neither appropriate nor interesting.

But let me offer this: I believe that chemistry is real and that it matters. I believe that kindred spirits and soul mates are real. I believe that we spend many years believing in the well-meant but totally cock-eyed interpretation of us handed down by family lore and old relationships, and that as soon as we jettison all that — really flush it down the toilet for good, it is possible for love to come, and to last. It is that latter process — not having a baby, not getting married, not getting our first paycheck — that makes us truly adult, and makes us truly free for true love to find us.

I have no idea if my new friend from Florida will be a true love. I’m not speaking of what is, but what I believe could be — if not now, maybe later. If not for me, God willing, for thee.

It takes a tremendous amount of work and effort to understand, accept and really know ourselves — to consider the input from those who know us (or think they do) along with our own knowledge of self, and to come up with an accurate and fair assessment of our own character and soul, needs, wants and responsibilities. It takes even harder work than that to hold that authentic person in affectionate and compassionate care, to move beyond the fear and woundedness that comes from being disappointed and treated insensitively, to stop dwelling on past failures, and to trust that God truly has made a unique and precious gift in us that deserves to be honored, and whose deepest recesses are known only to the silent soul. These private places of the soul should not be pried open by curious onlookers or cold-hearted Lotharios who pursue profound confidences in the same fashion that the paparazzi pursue the latest lurid photos of Britney Spears.

Many women have been socialized to gather the opinions of their friends and family when it comes to every subject from how to make a particular recipe, to what they should wear on a first date, to whether or not they should marry, to what career they should pursue next. This kind of intimate and constant gab can be deeply bonding and intimate, but it can also breed the exhaustion and mild contempt that comes with over-exposure to someone else’s vulnerability. At times the best thing for a woman is to cut off, or to be taken off this kind of life-support (however cruel that sounds) and to stand in her own truth for awhile. Not just to cultivate wisdom through spiritual practice and attention to her intuition (which she should be doing already), but to actively assess and, if need be, reject the version of herself assembled by her circle of intimates and to shore up her confidence in the true version; the woman she finally, after many years of hard and honest work, knows she is.

How can I ask someone to love me for better or for worse, unless I can love and accept myself through my own better or worse? Cliched to say it, but I owe my true friends the gift of finally getting it through my thick head that even at our “worst,” we all deserve to be treated sensitively and with compassion, and that love at its most basic means sticking-by. The lesson has finally stuck. Thanks, pals. You know who you are. What Jesus has been trying to convince me of for all these years, you have made real. Wouldn’t it be nice to have the opportunity to practice that spiritual discipline with a Sig Other?

Let’s just say this: if I do ever find true love I would want it to be just like this: during a time of radical emotional freedom and healing, of feeling particularly clear on who I am, what I need and how I want and expect to love and be loved. So no matter what happens with this particular conflagration, as the old song goes, “They Can’t Take That Away From Me.”

Oh, and you know that check-list that so many of us carry around in our heads about who we think we should be with? I’m re-assessing my approach to that. My checklist used to have 40 or so items on it. Now it has about 12:

My Ideal Mate

1. Should be kind and considerate.
2. Should know how to love and be loved, and that includes honesty, trust and loyalty.
3. Should have a great sense of humor.
4. Intelligence.
5. Some kind of cultural interests and talents.
6. Charisma.
7. Be attractive to me.
8. Be attracted to me.
9. Have nice manners.
10. Not be an active addict or criminal.
11. Be politically progressive and actively involved in a spiritual practice or community.
12. Makes my heart go thumpety-thump.

****
Comment by Dutch Treat — February 1, 2008 #

A dozen, down from forty? It’s no wonder some people think men and women come from different planets! Since adolescence my list has grown from one item to two:

1. Has nice tits (any size)
2. Not crazy (negotiable if tits are nice enough)

Seriously though, of course there has to be some sort of mutual attraction or the whole thing’s a non-starter.

Kind, considerate, well-mannered…sure, why not? I mean who wants to be with a cruel, rude and inconsiderate slob? (Oops. Forget I said that. Sorry I asked).

Intelligence and a great sense of humor are highly overrated. I frequently get turned down for dates by women who don’t think they’re smart enough for me. Good thing I can still laugh about it.

Let’s see, spiritually-aware progressive or drug-addicted criminal? I’m going to have to think about that one a little longer.

Making someone’s heart go thumpety-thump is not exactly something anyone can expect to do 24/7, not even movie stars. Some days (hell, these days most days) I’ll settle for a toe-curling climax. Although I have to admit that the next best thing is that sly half-grin and playful twinkle in the eye that reminds me of the last one, and makes me eager for the next.

Charisma? What exactly do you mean by “Charisma?” But I suppose you know it when you see it.

I guess if I were making a longer list (besides the cleavage and sanity thing, and skirting entirely the far more troubling issue of whether or not constant societal objectification eventually makes ALL women crazy), I would have to say that I generally go for smart and funny too — along with kind, considerate, sensitive, well-mannered, politically-progressive and great hair. And yes, she ought to be at least as into me as I’m into her…but not TOO much more — because that gets complicated too.

But mostly I’m just looking for someone who “gets” me — an adventurous soul, curious and generous, thankful, broad-minded, well-travelled and non-judgmental…and definitely not a prude either, although shy and slightly modest (or even a little demure) is probably a better fit than loud and profane.

Not that there’s anything wrong with loud and profane.

But at the end of the day, it really does come down to knowing how to love and be loved. And isn’t this really what we’re all trying to figure out anyway? Honesty. Loyalty. Trust-WORTHINESS. I’m surprised Fidelity didn’t make the list. For a lot of folks, that would have been #1. Not to mention plain and simple old fashioned “commitment.” But that’s what we're all supposed to be afraid of, right?



***

Being Alive: Reflections on The Search For Commitment
February 2, 2008 on 8:49 pm |

I wrote a few days ago about how Cupid done zinged me and a poor, unfortunate soul right in the soft, fleshy part of the heart while I was down in Florida, and Dutch Treat commented that I left “commitment” off of my list of Ideal Qualities for a mate. He said a lot of other worthy things, too, including suggesting that constant objectification may make all women crazy to one degree or another. Well said, brother, and thanks for the weirdly feminist solidarity there, ’cause I tend to agree with you.

I left “commitment” off my list because it was looming so large in my mind that I plumb forgot it. Of course, trustWORTHINESS and commitment. First. Foremost. Forever. How could I have forgotten to say so? What else is there in the end, and what else has been so painfully and sorely missing from all of my previous relationships? You can be in the big, glorious Love Shack all day long, but until someone says, “You and me, baby. You are the brass ring and I’m grabbing it, I’m coming for you, I’m launching myself over the castle walls of all the years of your bitter disappointments and coming to get you, ’cause you’re the prize,” all that billing and cooing and dopamine high is just a pleasant diversion, a sport, a delicious but ultimately unsatisfying meal. And, at my age, increasingly not worth the effort and the hurt. A girl can only get her hopes up so often before she loses some resilience and opts for quiet, peaceful nights with the cat over a ride on the dopamine rollercoaster.

Folks like me who have been dating for what seems like thousands of years are intensely weary of the “Shopping for a Mate” approach made particularly crass by on-line dating sites (scroll through the faces and descriptions, delete, delete, delete, scroll, scroll, scroll some more) and are intensely familiar with the issue of commitment, or lack thereof. We dress up for the Relationship Audition, doll up, get and give the once-over, hope to finally attract a decent companion who will hang around long enough to (however begrudgingly) come to care for us and to become the guy/gal who has GOT. OUR. BACK. Over many years, we come to understand that we have got our own backs, and that single life is wonderful in many ways. But still, for many of us, the hope lingers. We are fine on our own, but gee, wouldn’t it be great to have a Special Someone? Not just any old someone you’re settling for, but someone worthy of the effort it takes to be in a relationship?

While we search, here’s some of what chicks like me endure on those hundreds of dates:

1. No chemistry and occasionally nearly-fatal boredom. 2. We like him, he doesn’t like us; rejection. 3. Slight attraction, but no time or energy for a relationship. 4. He’s depressed, bitter and angry about divorce, needs a therapist, not a girlfriend. 5. Can’t stop talking about former relationships/guilt about being bad father to children. 6. Addictions, or constant reference to former addictions that obviously define his life and sense of self (not necessarily a character flaw, just can’t relate). 7. Major religious differences with obvious lack of respect for our beliefs; arrogant spiritual superiority. 8. Voted for George Bush, and would again. 9. Immediate, unwelcome pressure for sex/no interest in physical intimacy. 10. The scary drama queen- wants to marry you even though you’ve expressed not one iota of interest. 11. Sexy but obnoxious, irritates you even as he attracts you. 12. Funny, cute but totally passive, dating him finally feels like dragging 200 lbs. of potatoes behind us on a little red wagon. 13. Charming, sexy and attentive but just a low-down, cheating lying dawg in the end. 14. Intimidated by successful women/unsupportive of your life (in my case, considers the Church competition for my time, love and attention). 15. Just a loser you would never have wasted your time on if you hadn’t been so lonely (Yes, God loves him but he’s got nothing whatsoever to offer you).

This is how I’ve spent the past 15 years. One item to represent each year. I could go on, of course. The inappropriate crushes. The ones who seem great from a distance (such an impressive resume!) but are really sleazy characters up close. The egotists and the closet cases, the controllers, the ones with no listening skills, the naughty ones you shouldn’t have messed with but couldn’t resist.

You have to kiss a lot of frogs, kids. So let’s hear some good news! Let’s hear about the couples who met and knew, before very long that they had found the brass ring, let’s hear about the ones who clicked and made it stick, the ones who found each other, who spoke “commitment” not as a dirty word but as a delicious caress on the ear. Let’s hear about those of you who dated for as long as I have and at long last met someone whose integrity and goodness your heart could immediately detect even through thick, crusty layers of hurt, disappointment, bitterness and cynicism. Let’s hear about trust, and how your soul can feel that it has come home in someone’s presence, let’s hear it for love in time for Valentine’s Day. Why not? We certainly hear enough bad news about it; let’s sit around the PeaceBang fire and share some of the quiet, unreported tales of happiness between two people.

You do that, and while you do, dig these lyrics by master Broadway genius Stephen Sondheim who wrote this song for the musical “Company,”

BEING ALIVE

Someone to hold you too close
Someone to hurt you too deep
Someone to sit in your chair
And ruin your sleep
And make you aware of being alive
Someone to need you too much
Someone to know you too well
Someone to pull you up short
And put you through hell
And give you support for being alive-being alive
Make me alive, make me confused
Mock me with praise, let me be used
Vary my days, but alone is alone, not alive!
Somebody hold me too close
Somebody force me to care
Somebody make me come through
Ill always be there
As frightened as you of being alive,
Being alive, being alive!
Someone you have to let in
Someone whose feelings you spare
Someone who, like it or not
Will want you to share a little, a lot of being alive
Make me alive, make me confused
Mock me with praise, let me be used
Vary my days, but alone is alone, not alive!
Somebody crowd me with love
Somebody force me to care
Somebody make me come through
Ill always be there
As frightened as you to help us survive,
Being alive, being alive, being alive, being alive

I am SO ready...

13 February 2008 at 23:58
for winter to be over. Last night's storm was the most annoying yet; probably 8 inches of wet, heavy snow, and of course the snowplow buried my recycling before the garbage collector could collect it...then about 9 am the snow switched over to freezing rain, and then not-so-freezing rain, and now after nightfall the street outside my house is like a river. Not a slow, lazy, meandering river either. A rushing river....

Needless to say, Princess Parker is not pleased. But I don't think I'd be too happy either if I had to strip naked and poop in snow up to my chest. At least the local firefighters had the good manners to come shovel out a hydrant for her!



Clearly, not a fit night out for man nor beast. And our little household is one of each....

COMPASSION

3 February 2008 at 18:58
a sermon preached by the Rev. Dr. Tim W. Jensen
at the First Parish Church in Portland, Maine
Sunday February 3rd, 2008

"Sometimes we think that to develop an open heart, to be truly loving and compassionate, means that we need to be passive, to allow others to abuse us, to smile and let anyone do what they want with us. Yet this is not what is meant by compassion. Quite the contrary. Compassion is not at all weak. It is the strength that arises out of seeing the true nature of suffering in the world. Compassion allows us to bear witness to that suffering, whether it is in ourselves or others, without fear; it allows us to name injustice without hesitation, and to act strongly, with all the skill at our disposal. To develop this mind state of compassion...is to learn to live, as the Buddha put it, with sympathy for all living beings, without exception." --Sharon Salzberg

***

I feel like I’d be shirking my duties just a little bit if I didn’t say just a word or two about this afternoon’s sporting event. “Super Sunday” is in many ways a uniquely American spectacle, to which the game itself is almost incidental. It represents a “high holy day” in America’s Civil Religion: an unapologetic celebration of the values of excellence, competition, over-the-top consumer spending and free market capitalism, with a good measure of (dare I say it?) fanatical Patriotism thrown in...all ritualized in a form of mock warfare which dwarfs the gladiatorial contests of ancient Rome in its scope and scale.

Actual tickets for the game itself run into the thousands of dollars apiece (that is, if you can find them at all, since these days most are distributed through corporate sponsors, sophisticated high-end scalpers, or by a lottery for a few lucky season ticket holders of the two representative teams). The vast majority of “ordinary” people -- some 90 million of us -- will be watching the game on TV, often at some sort of “Super Bowl party” hosted in someone’s home or at a local “public house.” Sales of big screen, high-definition television sets are always especially brisk the week or two before the big game, and the owner of my favorite little sports dining establishment told me this past week that he is preparing 900 pounds of Buffalo-style chicken wings in order to meet just his catering orders for this afternoon’s game.

And then there are the commercials, which are an event unto themselves. The average price of a 30 second advertising spot this year is $2.7 million. Yet this is nothing compared to the nearly TEN BILLION dollars that experts estimate will be wagered on this game, $100 million of which will actually be bet legally in Las Vegas, where the bookmakers now have the Patriots as 12 point favorites.

But my favorite Super Sunday human interest story this year is about Buddy, a three year old Black Labrador Retriever who discovered the Express Courier envelope containing his owner’s two $900 apiece Super Bowl tickets, and chewed it to pieces. That’s right, the dog ate his tickets. Fortunately, the taste of two $900 apiece Super Bowl tickets apparently didn’t really agree with Buddy, who left them merely covered with teeth marks and dog slobber rather than swallowing them, which means that his owner is going to be able to attend the game after all, rather than drowning his sorrows in Budweiser, and gorging himself with BBQ dog while watching the game at home on TV.

And then, with only a day between to sleep it off, comes Super Tuesday, when a quarter of the nation will be voting to help determine the two major party nominees for next November’s Presidential election. Most of the media attention now is on the Democratic side, where the party faithful are attempting to decide whether to nominate history’s first “significant” woman candidate, or the first African American one. And there’s even some talk now of a so-called “dream-ticket” which would contain them both, if only they could agree about who gets to be on top.

Meanwhile, the Republicans are also flirting with history by exploring the possibility of nominating America’s first major party Mormon Presidential candidate. And even that old warhorse John McCain may have a surprise or two up his sleeve, if he manages to win the nomination, and decides to reach out across the aisle (as John Kerry did to him in 2004) to now-independent Senator and former Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee Joe Leiberman to round out his ticket.

But that’s all still months away. With the Patriots only one win away from a perfect season (and their fourth Super Bowl Championship in eight years); and the Celtics now boasting the best record in the NBA, it’s easy to forget that just last October the Red Sox were winning their second World Series in this century, having gone the better part of a century since having won their last one. So it’s a good time to be a sports fan in New England. And politics can wait for another day.

You may not have actually noticed, since I really didn’t make an especially big deal about it, but last week I stared a rather loosely-structured series of sermons on the seven principles of Unitarian Universalism. We started with the theme of “the inherent worth and dignity of every person,” and today I want to continue by talking about “Compassion,” or more specifically Justice, Equity and Compassion in human relations. As principles go, this is certainly a very fine one but achieving it in actual practice is hardly a walk in the park.

In the real world, Justice is never entirely blind or completely impartial (even with instant replay) -- it’s really more of an abstract goal and an aspiration than something we can count on to work perfectly all the time in each and every situation. Widespread injustice is a fact of life; and there are lots and lots of people who have a vested interest in keeping it that way, just as there are lots and lots of other people who go out every day and devote their lives to making injustice a little LESS widespread than it was the day before.

And if Justice itself is just an abstraction, then Equity is even more so. It’s an article of faith in this country, articulated by Thomas Jefferson right in the Declaration of Independence way back in 1776, and confirmed by Abraham Lincoln four score and seven years later, that “all men are created equal.” But if you just look around you’ll notices rather quickly that this proposition is hardly confirmed by the evidence of our own eyes.

Human beings basically have only three things in common: each of us is unique, none of us is perfect, and all of us are going to die. These three qualities may well make us equal in the eyes of Nature and Nature’s God, but that’s pretty much where it ends as well. Inequality is such a fundamental fact of life that we settle instead for the principle of “equity” -- all people may not be the same, but at least we’re going to try to treat them that way.

Yet even this basic principle of even-handed fairness is a difficult and challenging standard to achieve. We lift up the ideals of Justice and Equity as goals to guide our own behavior and interactions with one another, knowing in our heart of hearts that life isn’t fair and probably never will be, no matter how hard we may try.

But Compassion, it seems to me, is fundamentally different from these other two ideals. The ability to be compassionate comes from within us, and is thus always close at hand, always within our own power to express. Compassion is more than mere sympathy or empathy, although both of these qualities are clearly components of its character. Compassion goes beyond our natural human emotional tendency to feel pity for souls less fortunate than ourselves, or to act mercifully toward those within our power to help; it is more than mere charity as well, either in the narrow sense of personal philanthropy, or in the more profound sense of caritas or “benevolent love.”

In its essence, compassion means “to suffer with” -- it means opening our hearts to other people in a radically vulnerable way, in empathy and solidarity, in generosity and benevolence, realizing not only do we hope to change their lives by our involvement with them, but with a willingness to risk allowing that relationship to change OUR lives in the bargain. Compassion is the attempt to understand the lived experience of another human being in all its dignity and complexity, and then making that understanding an intimate and authentic part of our own lived experience as well.

In the Buddhist tradition, Compassion or karuna is one of the four immeasurable “sublime attitudes,” along with metta or “loving kindness; mudita or “sympathetic joy;” and upeksha, which is generally translated as “Equanimity.” Loving-Kindness is a wish for the happiness of others, while Compassion is a wish for others to be free from suffering. Sympathetic Joy is the ability to be happy because of the happiness of others, while Equanimity is “a detached, clear-minded state of tranquility which unconditionally accepts all sentient beings as equal.”

These four immeasurables can’t really be understood independently apart from one another, and are linked together through a meditative practice which attempts to cultivate a state of mindfulness which recognizes on some deep level that the happiness of any one of us is dependent upon the happiness of us all, and likewise injured by the suffering of any. Through meditation on these sublime attitudes, practitioners attempt to diminish (and ultimately eliminate) emotions of ill-will, cruelty, jealousy and personal desire, while at the same time expanding their awareness of the interconnectedness and interdependence of all self-aware creatures...breaking down the separations brought about by our self-consciousness, and binding us together in relationships of mutual support and concern.

Or to put it perhaps in more familiar terms, meditation on the four immeasurables help to reinforce the insight that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Yet even when we know this in our heads, we still need to figure out how to take it to heart, and then to try to change things in our own lives, and in the larger community where we live.

The legendary compassion of the Buddha, grounded in the unselfish wish to remove suffering and give joy, and the ability to take joy in the joy of others, while accepting everyone just as they are without preference or distinction, is perhaps the essence of “enlightenment” itself. It begins with the insight that no matter how different we each may seem, we all have a lot more in common than we think, and that by building on these commonalities while seeking to understand one another in all the complexity of our differences, we create a deeper sense of mutual connection and commitment that allows us to experience both the joys and the sorrows of other individuals as if they were our own. And by doing so, we enrich our own life experience in ways that are impossible to measure.

There’s a classic Buddhist story about a young mother named Kisa Gotami, who became desperate with grief after the death of her only child. Carrying the body of her dead son with her, she asked everyone she met for a medicine that might restore him to life, and was eventually directed to the Buddha, who told her that he would more than happy to do as she asked. All he required, he told the distraught mother, was that she bring him a few mustard seeds from a house that had never known death.

“Overjoyed at the prospect of having her son restored to life,” the story continues, “Kisa Gotami ran from house to house, begging for some mustard seeds. Everyone was willing to help but she could not find a single home where death had not occurred. The people were only too willing to part with their mustard seeds, but they could not claim to have not lost a dear one in death. As the day dragged on, she realized hers was not the only family that had faced death and that there were more people dead than living. As soon as she realized this, her attitude towards her dead son changed; she was no longer attached to the dead body of her son and she realized how simply the Buddha had taught her a most important lesson: that everything that is born must eventually die.”

And so Kisa Gotomi buried her dead son, and returned to the Buddha to tell him what she had learned. Eventually she became one of his most devoted and accomplished followers. The Buddha eased Kisa Gotami’s suffering, not by restoring life to the dead, but by connecting her grief to the grief and suffering of so many others. And by this simple act of Compassion, the burden of her grief became less unbearable, and she was able to let go of her attachment to something precious that ultimately was not hers to keep.

Some of you may remember when I preached here in July for the first time after arriving as your called and settled Parish minister, I described “an ethic of compassion,” along with the “value of community” and the “wisdom of common sense” as one of the three fundamental criteria by which I measure the validity of any religious belief. And in my own mind, these three criteria all come together in a very simple and straightforward way around yet another “C” word: the word “Companionship.” A companion is literally someone with whom we share bread. Companionship embodies the ideals of hospitality and generosity, equity and equality, mutual concern, joint interests, and common purpose. It implies shared hardships and shared joys, all grounded in the basic human necessity of eating life-sustaining food, and eating it together.

We may not be able to establish Justice and Equity in human relations in our lifetimes. We may not always be able to practice Compassion as faithfully as we would like. But we can become companions to one another, and work to expand that circle of companionship wider and wider, as we share our lives with the lives of others, and allow ourselves to be changed by that experience in ways we can never fully anticipate, but must instead learn simply to trust. Each of us is unique. None of us is perfect. And all of us are someday going to die. But in the meantime, is it too much to expect that we learn to treat each other fairly, that we understand our differences as something that we all have in common, and that, on occasion at least, we break bread together while gathered round to watch the big game on TV?...

READINGS:

THE NEGRO SPEAKS OF RIVERS
By Langston Hughes

I've known rivers:

I've known rivers ancient as the world and older than the flow of human blood in human veins.

My soul has grown deep like the rivers.

I bathed in the Euphrates when dawns were young.

I built my hut near the Congo and it lulled me to sleep.

I looked upon the Nile and raised the pyramids above it.

I heard the singing of the Mississippi when Abe Lincoln went down to New Orleans, and I've seen its muddy bosom turn all golden in the sunset.

I've known rivers:

Ancient, dusky rivers.

My soul has grown deep like the rivers.

***
I KNOW WHY THE CAGED BIRD SINGS
by Maya Angelou

A free bird leaps on the back
Of the wind and floats downstream
Till the current ends and dips his wing
In the orange suns rays
And dares to claim the sky.

But a BIRD that stalks down his narrow cage
Can seldom see through his bars of rage
His wings are clipped and his feet are tied
So he opens his throat to sing.

The caged bird sings with a fearful trill
Of things unknown but longed for still
And his tune is heard on the distant hill for
The caged bird sings of freedom.

The free bird thinks of another breeze
And the trade winds soft through
The sighing trees
And the fat worms waiting on a dawn-bright
Lawn and he names the sky his own.

But a caged BIRD stands on the grave of dreams
His shadow shouts on a nightmare scream
His wings are clipped and his feet are tied
So he opens his throat to sing.

The caged bird sings with
A fearful trill of things unknown
But longed for still and his
Tune is heard on the distant hill
For the caged bird sings of freedom.

From Toast of the Town...

2 February 2008 at 23:21
to Just Toast. I wish I could say I wrote that, but it's actually something I saw on-line linking to a story about Rudy Giuliani's recent withdrawal from the Presidential campaign. Still, there's nothing I like better than a clever, well-turned phrase. Seems a pity to squander it on the washed-out aspirations of a washed-up Mayor. Even if he was the Mayor of New York City.

Maybe the Romans did say it better. Sic Gloria Transit Mundi Usually translated as "All Glory is Fleeting," but perhaps better expressed as "thus goes worldly glory." Three things all human beings have in common: each of us is unique, none of us is perfect, all of us are going to die. It's important to remember in our moments of triumph, when we stand out above the admiring crowd, that in the end we all become one with the dust from whence we came. As Kurt Vonnegut put it, "so it goes." The details are merely incidental.

And yet, God is also in the details. In the face of death and with painfully-full awareness of our own imperfections, we remain the fortunate recipients of this amazing gift of life itself: this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to live, to love, to indulge in the pleasures of our senses and explore wherever our curious imaginations may lead us -- to weigh the worth and value of all we encounter, make judgments, make choices, make a difference in the world. We are born blind, helpless and completely dependent upon the care of others, aware only of the power of our own appetites. How we live from that moment forward to the moment of our death is the product of a great many things beyond our control, but ultimately we alone are charged with the privilege and the duty, the right and the responsibility, the opportunity and the obligation to determine what our lives will mean in the greater scheme of the universe.

Kinda seems a little overwhelming, doesn't it? But you know, that's just the way life is sometimes....

CAMBODIAN ORPHAN UPDATE

1 February 2008 at 10:53
In the last few hours of this contest, The Sharing Foundation surged from out of the money into first place, with over 1700 unique individual contributors (approximately 300 of whom came forward to donate on the last day). You can see the unofficial final results below. Thanks so much to all of you who helped make this possible! Small acts of generosity by large numbers of people can indeed make great things happen.

Global Giving Challenge Leaderboard (unofficial final results)

ROUTE OUT OF POVERTY FOR CAMBODIAN CHILDREN

31 January 2008 at 14:26
So here's today's big chance to do one small thing to make the world a little bit better place for us all. But don't think about it too long, because the contest ends today at High Noon, Pacific Standard Time (that's 3 pm here on the East Coast). It's only going to cost you $10, and is going to make a huge difference in the lives of some very small children; so if you could find it in your heart to take five minutes to make a donation and then e-mail your own friends, it would be a very good thing. And personally, I would LOVE to be able to say that it was MY friends who put them over the top and into the money.

Donate to the Sharing Foundation

DIGNITY

27 January 2008 at 22:38
a sermon preached by the Rev Dr. Tim W. Jensen
at the First Parish Church in Portland, Maine
Sunday January 27, 2008

OPENING WORDS: “Neither a lofty degree of intelligence, nor imagination, nor both together go to the making of genius. Love, love, love, that is the soul of genius” -- Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, b. Jan 27, 1756

***

My message this morning is a simple one: so simple, in fact, I can summarize it in three words. "People are Precious." I wish I could say that I thought that up myself, but I didn't — it was originally the motto of the Reverend Robert “Daddy Bob” Raible, who was for many years the minister of the First Unitarian Church in Dallas, and whose son Peter Raible was one of my early mentors in ministry at University Unitarian Church in Seattle. But it's still a good motto, and I'm not above stealing it; and I put it before you this morning not so much as a proposition of fact, but rather as a proposition of faith.

If I were to stick strictly to the facts, I think I would have an awfully tough time proving this proposition. What is the inherent worth of a human being anyway? A couple of dollars in chemicals, the value of which is doubtlessly less than the cost of their extraction? Or perhaps a few dollars an hour, 40 hours a week, 50 weeks a year — even less if you happen to have been born somewhere in the so-called “developing” world. And I suppose in some way it’s always been this way. “The poor ye shall always have with you,” and perhaps the best first thing we really can do to remedy that situation is to work hard not to become one of them ourselves. It’s not the whole solution, but it’s a start.

Of course, having grown up in Seattle, I was born into a community that is generally considered one of the major beneficiaries of globalization. And, of course, over the many years I lived in the Pacific Northwest, I also eventually became something of a coffee-snob.

It’s true; one of my greatest “small pleasures” in life is brewing and drinking freshly ground whole-bean coffee. These days, I generally try to seek out shade-grown, Fair Trade beans when I can find them (and they’re becoming much easier to find all the time); they cost a few dollars more; but I can afford it, and it’s worth it to me...not because the quality of the coffee itself is any better, but for the difference I’d like to HOPE it makes in the quality of other peoples lives.

Fair trade or not, the Colombian peasant who handpicked those coffee beans (Juan Valdez, or one of his neighbors) was probably only paid pennies for his labor: the average wage of a Latin American coffee picker is still only a couple of dollars a day.

The part-time barista who sells me the coffee is probably doing a little bit better, possibly earning slightly more than the minimum wage: still not enough to support a family above the official US government poverty line, but a fortune to someone like Juan Valdez.

And would anyone even care to hazard a guess at the net worth and gross annual income of Howard Schultz, the founder, former, and now once again Chief Executive Officer of Starbucks?

If I were to ask each of you, individually, "what are you worth?" what would you tell me? The amount of money you earn? The size of your investment portfolio? The appraised value of your home minus the outstanding balance of your mortgage? As I said, if I were to present it to you as a proposition of fact, I would have a difficult time proving my case.

So instead I put it before you as a proposition of faith. "People are Precious" — every human being has an inherent worth and dignity which we must honor and respect as people of faith. Starbucks is generally considered a pretty progressive company, but we all know in our heart of hearts that Howard Schultz is not inherently a more worthy person than Juan Valdez simply because his annual income is several hundred thousand times as great.

Nor do corporate CEO's have some kind of God-given right to dictate policies that deliberately (or even unintentionally) undermine the worth and dignity of third-world people simply because the impersonal nature of the global economy and international commodities markets allows them that power.

Actions like these are on some fundamental level both immoral and unjust — and one of our principle responsibilities as a faith community is to educate ourselves about these things, to try to understand them in all their complexity, to confront them, and then to learn how best to change them -- first in our own lives, and then in the larger society where we live.

Yet I also realize at times these issues and these responsibilities are difficult even for reasonably sensitive and political aware individuals to see and fully comprehend, preoccupied as we so often are by our own economic circumstances, and the outrageous price of heating oil, and sneakers, and whole-bean coffee.

Worth is one thing. Dignity is something else. To dignify something is to honor it, whether it is truly worthy or not, which is why diplomats treat even the most notoriously odious “official” dignitaries as honored and respected guests: to do otherwise would be undignified.

An indignity, on the other hand, is a source of insult and humiliation, to which it often seems the only appropriate response is one of righteous indignation. An ability to maintain one’s own sense of dignity even in the midst of the most undignifying and embarrassing circumstances is a wonderful skill; it allows us to retain a feeling of self-respect and self-confidence even when all the evidence would seem to be pointing in the opposite direction. In my experience, the secret to this skill is really very simple: it is merely the cultivation of a humble willingness to appear foolish for a worthy cause.

And likewise, the willingness to treat others with dignity and respect, regardless of their particular circumstances or perceived “worthiness,” is a magnificent gift: a small act of generosity and kindness in what is often a cruel and unforgiving world.

And this is why it is so appropriate that we begin with the proposition that "People Are Precious." Because an important early step in every spiritual journey is the humble recognition and acknowledgment of our own inherent worth and dignity: the realization that despite our own apparent unworthiness, that we are unique, that we are special, that we have been given a great gift thin the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity simply to be alive -- a give we didn’t really ask for, and don’t really deserve, and for which our only appropriate response is one of gratitude and generosity.

And this in turn is followed by a great leap of faith, in the form of a devoted commitment to treat others with the same respect and dignity and integrity we believe we are worthy of receiving ourselves.

"Love your neighbor as yourself, " "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you" — the Golden Rule, the fundamental moral teaching of every great religion known to humankind. It's a simple rule: most of us have known it by heart since childhood. So why, then, is the Golden Rule so difficult a principle to take to heart?

I can think of at least three common factors which contribute to our inhibitions to live up to this ideal. And the first is simply the common human tendency to be suspicious: to anticipate the worst out of a given situation rather than making a special effort to have it turn out for the best. I have no doubts some of you may have also heard that well-known parody of the Golden Rule: "Do unto others before they get the chance to do it unto you."

In a society as mobile and transient as ours, where anonymity is often the rule rather than the exception, and we must frequently interact with total strangers, trust can become a very precious commodity. Sometimes it can seem as though an open and trusting attitude merely extends an open invitation for others to take advantage of us; we’ve all heard those proverbs as well: "a fool and his money are soon parted," "never give a sucker an even break."

Yet although a certain degree of caution and skepticism may well be an unavoidable necessity in preventing our own exploitation by the unscrupulous, this does not grant us a license to be callous or manipulative in our own behavior. The Golden Rule does not call us to do unto others as we are afraid they might do unto us. It demands a standard somewhat higher than our minimum expectations. It calls us to maintain an ideal which exceeds what we might reasonably expect of others, to act the way we might wish to be treated, respecting the worth and dignity of strangers even when they have done nothing in particular to deserve it, simply because by doing so we affirm our own worth and dignity as well.

It calls for us to be trustworthy even when those we deal with may not be completely worthy of our trust. It calls for us to be honest even when we fear we are being cheated. It calls for us to be truthful even when we know we are being lied to. It calls for us to be forgiving, and generous of spirit, simply because that is the right way to be. It does not, I believe, require that we become fools or suckers. It merely insists that we refrain from exploiting the weakness and naiveté of others, even when it lies within our power to do so.

This brings us to a second source of inhibition: that sinking feeling many of us experience deep down inside us that maybe we don't really deserve to be treated as well as we are. Popular psychology even has a name for this experience — it's called "The Impostor Syndrome," and it's dangerous because it tempts us to believe that we can't afford to be kind and generous of spirit; that deep down inside we're really just fakes, and if we allow ourselves to be too forgiving, we run the risk of being found out as something less than we appear.

Of course, the great irony of this affliction (which I suspect is far more common than most of us would imagine) is that what it truly reflects is the tendency of many sincere human beings to judge themselves by standards far more strict and demanding than those by which they would ordinarily be evaluated by their peers. Knowing those deep, dark secrets which only we can know about ourselves, we become our own worst critics; and thus it appears to us far less threatening simply to withdraw from a profound and authentic engagement with the world, than it would be to do unto others as harshly as we ourselves do unto ourselves.

Until we are willing honestly to take responsibility for our triumphs, and forgive ourselves our failures, we stand little chance of doing likewise for those with whom we interact. When our own sense of worth and dignity is so tenuous, so fragile, we simply become incapable of recognizing that everyone else is in exactly the same boat. How can we put ourselves in the other guy's shoes when our own seem too large for us to fill?

Perhaps the Impostor Syndrome would be more easily overcome were it not for the third inhibition I perceive to the ideal: the tendency of our society to set up false and artificially objectified categories of worth and privilege, which undermine our appreciation of the inherent worth and dignity which is all of our birthrights. "Whosoever has the Gold makes the rules" — a man is only worth the value of his productive labor, and a woman 67% of that.

The absurdity of it all is apparent on its face; and yet its pervasive cultural influence remains undiminished. There are winners and there are losers, the elect and the reprobate, the sheep and the goats, the sharks and the minnows. Our dignity is dependent solely upon our worth; our worth dependent exclusively upon our wealth; and those who have nothing deserve nothing better.

This philosophy, which sometimes goes by the name of Social Darwinism, takes an instrumental view of humankind — life is cheap, people are playthings. The means and the ability to impose one's will upon the world becomes the ultimate standard of moral authority; might makes right, and is its own justification.

Yet any ideology which takes an exclusively economic view of human worth is ultimately both soul-crushing and spiritually bankrupts; we become our jobs, we are reduced to our paychecks, we are left pre-disposed to live and die as nothing more than replaceable parts in the gigantic industrial engine which drives our throw-away civilization.

As I said when we started this morning, a belief in the inherent worth and dignity of every person is fundamentally a proposition of faith. This odd notion that "People are Precious" in and of themselves is a dangerous one, because it requires us at times to make a radical response to the world we see around us.

Yet it also stands at the center of our religious tradition, and indeed, at the center of the broader Faith traditions out of which we have come. Ultimately, I believe, it is the source of our capacity for compassion, for altruism, for the recognition of our common humanity beyond differences of race, culture, gender, or any of the other superficial things which distance and separate us one from another.

And yes it is also essential to our own personal spiritual growth and development, and perhaps even to our survival as a species upon this planet.

But for the moment perhaps we can be content simply to do unto others as we would have others do unto us, in kindness and in generosity, in forgiveness and in love, as we struggle to make habits of what we most value and believe, and learn to trust the wisdom of those things we know in our heart of hearts must be true....
โŒ